NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : The Movie Network Channels Pty Ltd v Optus Vision Pty Ltd [2009] NSWSC 132
HEARING DATE(S) : 16/02/09, 18/02/09 - 20/02/09, 23/02/09 - 25/02/09, 5/03/09, 12/03/09
JUDGMENT DATE : 17 March 2009
JURISDICTION : Equity Division Commercial List
JUDGMENT OF : Einstein J
DECISION : Application dismissed.
CATCHWORDS : Application by plaintiff for leave to reopen - Principles - Defendant had made forensic decision now not able to be undone
CATEGORY : Procedural and other rulings
ASIC v Rich (2006) 235 ALR 587 Australasian Meat Industry Employees' Union (WA Branch); ex parte Ferguson (1986) 67 ALR 491 Autodesk Inc v Dyason (No. 2) (1993) 176 CLR 300 Barker v Furlong [1891] 2 Ch 172 Betts v Whittingslowe (No 1) [1944] SASR 163; Hughes v Hill [1937] SASR 285 Granitgard Pty Ltd v Termicide Pest Control Pty Ltd (No 3) [2009] FCA 82 Hawthorn Glen Pty Ltd v Aconex Pty Limited (No 1) [2007] FCA 2010 CASES CITED : Inspector-General in Bankruptcy v Bradshaw [2006] FCA 22 Jesseron Holdings Pty Ltd v Middle East Trading Consultants Pty Ltd (No 2) (1994) 122 ALR 717 Multicon Engineering Pty Ltd v Federal Airports Corporation, Supreme Court of New South Wales, Cole J, 10 December 1993, unreported Smith v NSW Bar Association (1992) 176 CLR 256 Telecom Vanuatu Ltd v Optus Networks Pty Ltd (No 2) [2009] NSWSC 33 Urban Transport Authority of NSW v Nweiser (1992) 28 NSWLR 471 Watson v Metropolitan (Perth) Passenger Transport Trust [1965] WAR 88 Woolworth Ltd v Olson [2004] NSWSC 871
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate