NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision: 261 ALR 123235 FLR 122[2010] ALMD 150575 NSWLR 581[2010] ALMD 1509[2010] ALMD 1511[2010] ALMD 2004197 A Crim R 537
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: LEE v DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS (CTH) [2009] NSWCA 347 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S): 3 September 2009
JUDGMENT DATE: 22 October 2009
JUDGMENT OF: Basten JA at 1; Macfarlan JA at 1; Sackville AJA at 1
1. Grant the applicant leave to appeal from the judgment of Hidden J given on 20 March 2009. DECISION: 2. Dispense with the requirements to file and serve the Amended Notice of Appeal. 3. Dismiss the appeal. 4. Order that Mr Lee pay the Director's costs in this Court.
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL ASSETS – proceeds of crime – examination order not yet made –discretionary decision whether to grant examination order – discretionary decision to give notice requiring examination – offence under Act to refuse to answer question in examination –statutory abrogation of privilege against self-incrimination – immunity from use of answers in evidence – whether stay of proceedings justified in order to protect a fundamental right – Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (Cth), s 180 - CRIMINAL ASSETS – proceeds of crime – forfeiture order not yet made – resistance to order only by way of application for exclusion order – exclusion order requires reasonable opportunity for examination – potential for self-incrimination – whether stay of proceedings justified – Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (Cth), s 49 - EVIDENCE – privilege against self-incrimination – ongoing criminal investigation – no charges laid nor anticipated – confiscation of proceeds of crime sought – potential for orders for personal examination in relation to affairs and forfeiture of property subject of restraining order – whether privilege abrogated - HUMAN RIGHTS – right to silence – privilege against self-incrimination - STATUTORY INTERPRETATION – proceeds of crime – purposive construction – whether clear statutory intention to override privilege against self-incrimination – Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (Cth)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate