NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: Quayle v R [2010] NSWCCA 16
HEARING DATE(S): 11 February 2010 JUDGMENT OF: Grove J at 1; Simpson J at 2; RA Hulme J at 3
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE: 11 February 2010
DECISION: Leave to appeal granted. Appeal allowed. Sentences quashed. Re-sentenced.
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW - sentence - supply prohibited drug (methylamphetamine) - no financial gain - evidence of substantial rehabilitation - sentences manifestly excessive
Drugs Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Crimes (Administration of Sentences) Act 1999
CATEGORY: Principal judgment
R v Bloomfield (1998) 44 NSWLR 734 R v Brown [1999] NSWCCA 349 R v Busuttil [2000] NSWCCA 383 R v El-Hayek [2004] NSWCCA 25 R v Emanuel [2004] NSWCCA 267 R v Fathers, unreported, Court of Criminal Appeal NSW, 31 August 1994 R v Galati [2003] NSWCCA 148 R v Garner [2009] NSWCCA 79 CASES CITED : R v Groat [2001] NSWCCA 452 R v Hemsley [2004] NSWCCA 228 R v Holden [2002] NSWCCA 397 R v Kenny [2000] NSWCCA 92 R v Langdon, unreported, Court of Criminal Appeal, 18 November 1996 R v Novakovic [2004] NSWCCA 437 R v Simpson [2001] NSWCCA 534; 2001 53 NSWLR 704 Regina v Gu [2006] NSWCCA 104 Wong v The Queen [2001] HCA 64; 207 CLR 584
PARTIES: Andrew David QUAYLE (Applicant) Regina (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate