NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Kingsway Group Limited (formerly known as Willis & Bowring Mortgage Investments Limited) v Belramoul & Ors [2009] NSWSC 345
HEARING DATE(S) : 28 April 2009
JUDGMENT DATE : 1 May 2009
JUDGMENT OF : Schmidt AJ
CATCHWORDS : PROCEDURE - Supreme Court procedure - New South Wales - defendants seeking further adjournment of hearing - counsel briefed late - opportunity to explore further expert evidence sought - dictates of justice required that application be refused - fair opportunity to arrange legal representation - scant evidence - adjournment refused
LEGISLATION CITED : Civil Procedure Act 2005 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005
CATEGORY : Procedural and other rulings
Dennis v Australian Broadcasting Corporation [2008] NSWCA 37 CASES CITED : E. G. and H Nominees Pty Ltd v General Mutual Insurance Co. Ltd (in Liquidation) and Anor (1978) 59 ALJR 460 Watson v Watson (1968) 2 NSWR 647 Willis & Bowring Mortgage Investments Limited v Belramoul & Ors [2009] NSWSC 125
Plaintiff - Kingsway Group Limited (formerly known as Willis & Bowring Mortgage Investments Limited) PARTIES : First Defendant - Nabil Belramoul Second Defendant - Suzanne Wendy Belramoul Third Defendant - Daryl Kenneth Badman
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 10266/06
COUNSEL : Mr C Harris, SC - Plaintiff Mr MLD Einfeld QC with Mr J Horowitz, counsel - Defendants
SOLICITORS : Willis & Bowring Solicitors - Plaintiff Websters - Defendants
- 8 - IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate