NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: Arun KUMAR v R [2010] NSWCCA 138
HEARING DATE(S): 16 December 2009
JUDGMENT DATE: 19 August 2010
JUDGMENT OF: McClellan CJatCL at 1; Simpson J at 2; Hidden J at 3
DECISION: Leave to appeal granted, appeal dismissed.
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW - sentence - money laundering and other offences arising out of identity fraud scheme - whether discount should have been allowed for assistance to authorities - whether sentence on money laundering count manifestly excessive
Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) Passports Act 1938 (Cth) Foreign Passports (Law Enforcement and Security) Act 2005 (Cth) LEGISLATION CITED: Financial Transaction Reports Act 1998 (Cth) Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999
CATEGORY: Principal judgment
R v Louis Sukkar [2005] NSWCCA 55 R v Gallagher (1991) 23 NSWLR 220 R v Chu (NSWCCA, unreported, 16 October 1998) Alchikh v R [2007] NSWCCA 345 Assafiri v R [2007] NSWCCA 159 CASES CITED : Du Randt v R [2008] NSWCCA 121 R v Viana [2008] NSWCCA 188 R v Z [2006] NSWCCA 342, 167 A Crim R 436 R v Ansari [2007] NSWCCA 204, 70 NSWLR 89 R v Van Dang Tran [2007] NSWDC 310 R v Huang and Siu [2007] NSWCCA 259, 174 A Crim R 370
PARTIES: Arun KUMAR (Applicant) REGINA (Respondent Crown)
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2008/10553
COUNSEL: B Stratton QC with PJ McGrath (Applicant) L Crowley (Respondent Crown)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate