NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: AYOUB, Omran v R; EL MASRI, Ali v R [2010] NSWCCA 196
HEARING DATE(S): 5 May 2010
JUDGMENT DATE: 6 September 2010
JUDGMENT OF: Hodgson JA at 1; Rothman J at 6; Barr AJ at 64
DECISION: (i) In each matter, leave to appeal granted; (ii) In each matter, the appeal is dismissed.
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal – sentence – detain for advantage in circumstances of aggravation – relevance of period of detention – significance of circumstances of detention – recitation of factors relevant to determination of objective seriousness is not multi-tier sentencing – failure to find special circumstances not error where no application made – manifest excess – grounds of appeal rejected – appeal dismissed
LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes Act 1900 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999
CATEGORY: Principal judgment
Andrews v Law Society of British Columbia [1989] 1 SCR 143 Dinsdale v The Queen [2000] HCA 54; (2000) 202 CLR 321 HAN, Zhi Qiang v R [2009] NSWCCA 300 House v The King [1936] HCA 40; (1936) 55 CLR 499 Jimmy v R [2010] NSWCCA 60 Johnson v R [2004] HCA 15; (2004) 78 ALJR 616 CASES CITED : Lowe v R [1984] HCA 46; (1984) 154 CLR 606 Markarian v R [2005] HCA 25; (2005) 228 CLR 357 Postiglione v R [1997] HCA 26; (1997) 189 CLR 295 R v Araya [2005] NSWCCA 283; (2005) 155 A Crim R 555 R v F [2002] NSWCCA 320; (2002) 132 A Crim R 308 R v Fernando (1992) 76 A Crim R 58 R v Tiddy [1969] SASR 575
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate