NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: Quetcher v R [2010] NSWCCA 257 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S): 24 September 2010
JUDGMENT DATE: 11 November 2010
JUDGMENT OF: McClellan CJatCL at 1; Latham J at 2; Price J at 3
DECISION: (i) Leave to appeal granted. (ii) Appeal dismissed.
CATCHWORDS: Criminal Law - sentencing - Commonwealth offences - whether Judge erred in taking into account applicant's record of interview when considering s 16A(2)(h) Crimes Act 1914 - whether error in assessment of likelihood of re-offending - whether sentences manifestly excessive.
Criminal Code Act (Cth) 1995 s 134.1, s 134.1(1), LEGISLATION CITED: s 134.2, s 134.2(1) Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) s 16A(1), s 16A(2), s 16A(2)(h)
CATEGORY: Principal judgment
Ali v R [2010] NSWCCA 35 Alseedi v R [2009] NSWCCA 185 Gok v R [2010] WASCA 185 Ly v R [2007] NSWCCA 28 Markarian v R (2005) 228 CLR 357 Pearce v R (1998) 194 CLR 610 CASES CITED : R v Hawkins (1989) 45 A Crim R 430 R v Knight [2004] NSWCCA 145 R v MAK; R v MSK (2006) 167 A Crim R 159 R v Olbrich (1999) 199 CLR 270 R v O'Keefe (1992) 60 A Crim R 201 R v Pont [2000] NSWCCA 419 R v Pipes [2004] NSWCCA 351 Sanchet v Director Public Prosecutions (Cth) [2006] NSWCCA 291
PARTIES: Regina Marita Quetcher
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2009/1463
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate