NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision: 78 NSWLR 225
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: Guthrie v Spence [2009] NSWCA 369 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S): 8 September 2009
JUDGMENT DATE: 17 November 2009
JUDGMENT OF: Basten JA at 1; Campbell JA at 2; Handley AJA at 210
DECISION: Orders made to rectify procedural deficiencies in court below. Leave to appeal granted. Appeal dismissed with costs.
CATCHWORDS: LIMITATION OF ACTIONS – postponement of the bar – disabilities – nature of the disability required – type of affairs with respect to which the disability must relate – nature of the suspension arising from a period of disability – meaning of "cause of action" in the Limitation Act 1969 – APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL – appeal – no order made in the court below – incomplete application for leave to appeal – procedure for dealing with a purported appeal when there was no order made in the District Court below – transfer of proceedings in the District Court for the purpose of making an order – PROCEDURE – interlocutory decisions – limitation of actions – methods by which a claim that a limitation period has been suspended might be litigated – EVIDENCE – admissibility of a history recorded in a medical report – WORDS AND PHRASES – "cause of action" – "substantially" – "affairs" – "management of his or her affairs"
Civil Liability Amendment (Personal Responsibility) Act 2002 Civil Procedure Act 2005 District Court Act 1973 Evidence Act 1995 Interpretation Act 1987 LEGISLATION CITED: Limitation Act 1969 Mental Health Act 1958 NSW Trustee and Guardian Act 2009 Protected Estates Act 1983 Supreme Court Act 1970 Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate