NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision: 193 A Crim R 190
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: PHAM v R [2009] NSWCCA 25
HEARING DATE(S): 27th November 2008
JUDGMENT DATE: 17 February 2009
JUDGMENT OF: Giles JA at 1; Latham J at 2; Mathews AJ at 53
DECISION: 1. Leave to appeal granted. 2. Appeal dismissed
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW - Sentence appeal - Plea of guilty to Supply Large Commercial Quantity of Prohibited Drug - Parity - Whether sentence manifestly excessive - Hardship to family members and to applicant - appeal dismissed.
LEGISLATION CITED: Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1986 Customs Act
CATEGORY: Principal judgment
R v Dang [2005] NSWCCA 430 Adams v The Queen [2008] HCA 15; 82 ALJR 718 R v Way [2004] NSWCCA 131; (2004) 60 NSWLR 168 R v Kerr [2003] NSWCCA 234 R v Formosa [2005] NSWCCA 363 Spinks v R [2007] NSWCCA 52 Yin v R [2007] NSWCCA 350 CASES CITED : Kauwenberghs v R [2008] NSWCCA 98 McGuiness v R [2008] NSWCCA 80 Yassine v R [2008] NSWCCA 139 Holden v R [2008] NSWCCA 100 Eken v R [2007] NSWCCA 320 Roberts v R [2007] NSWCCA 112 Elsobky v R [2006] NSWCCA 168 Le v R [2006] NSWCCA 136
PARTIES: Minh Tan Pham v R (Applicant) Regina (Respondent)
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2007/3140
COUNSEL: P Boulten SC (Applicant) GA Farmer (Respondent)
SOLICITORS: Watsons Solicitors and Barristers (Applicant) Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate