NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: Juul v Northey [2010] NSWCA 211
HEARING DATE(S): 11/11/09
JUDGMENT DATE: 26 August 2010
JUDGMENT OF: McColl JA at 1; Basten JA at 251; Campbell JA at 260
DECISION: See paragraph 250
CATCHWORDS: EQUITY – order for accounts on wilful default basis – whether evidence supported order - MONEY COUNTS – claim for money had and received – whether evidence estate had a claim – defences – whether retention of payment unjust - WILLS AND ESTATES – will – executor – removal – where allegation of wilful default personal to executor made out - PROCEDURE – pleadings – obligation to plead and particularise allegation of wilful default - PROCEDURE – effect of interlocutory orders – issue estoppel – whether open to judge to review matter decided in earlier proceedings between same parties - PROCEDURE – notice of judgment – where judgment affects rights or interest of person who is not a party – giving of notice under UCPR 46.12 to enable non-party interests to be protected - PROCEDURE – documents – cross-claim – out of time for filing cross-claim under rules of court – application for extension of time – delay caused by party's decision where on notice of potential liability – CPA 2005 (NSW) ss 56-60 – duties of parties in the conduct of litigation – just and efficient determination of proceedings - EVIDENCE – witnesses – credibility – whether basis established to challenge primary judge's finding on credibility
Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) LEGISLATION CITED: Limitations Act 1969 (NSW) Trustee Act 1925 (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005
CATEGORY: Principal judgment
Abalos v Australian Postal Commission [1990] HCA 47; (1990) 171 CLR 167 Adamson v Ede [2009] NSWCA 379 Aon Risk Services Australia Ltd v Australian National University [2009] HCA 27; (2009) 239 CLR 175. Australian Hardboards Limited v Hudson Investment Group Ltd [2007] NSWCA 104; (2007) 70 NSWLR 201 Bahin v Hughes (1886) 31 Ch D 390 Bartlett v Barclays Bank Trust Co Ltd (Nos 1 & 2) [1980] 1 Ch 515 Caldar v Public Trustee [2003] NSWCA 187 Carantinos v Magafas [2008] NSWCA 304 Commissioner of Police v Tanos [1958] HCA 6; (1958) 98 CLR 383 David Securities Pty Ltd v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [1992] HCA 48; (1992) 175 CLR 353 Devries v Australian National Railways Commission [1993] HCA 78; (1993) 177 CLR 472 Dowse v Gorton [1891] AC 190 Fox v Percy [2003] HCA 22; (2003) 214 CLR 118 Gava v Grljusich [1999] WASC 13 Glazier Holdings Pty Ltd v Australian Men's Health Pty Ltd (No 2) [2001] NSWSC 6 Gray v Guardian Trust Australia [2003] NSWSC 704 Harris v Digital Pulse Pty Ltd [2003] NSWCA 10; (2003) 56 NSWLR 298 House v R [1936] HCA 40; (1936) 55 CLR 499 International Advisor Systems Pty Ltd v XYYX Pty Ltd (No 3) [2008] NSWSC 430 Itek Graphix Pty Ltd v Elliott [2002] NSWCA 104; (2002) 54 NSWLR 207 Job v Job (1877) 6 Ch D 562 Jones v Morrall (1852) 2 Sim (NS) 241; 61 ER 333 Kuligowski v Metrobus [2004] HCA 34; (2004) 220 CLR 363 Letterstedt v Broers (1884) 9 App Cas 371 Levy v State of Victoria [1997] HCA 31; (1997) 189 CLR 579 Macedonian Orthodox Community Church St Petka Inc v His Eminence Petar The Diocesan Bishop of Macedonian Orthodox Diocese of Australia and New Zealand [2008] HCA 42; (2008) 237 CLR 66 Mavrideros v Mack (1998) 45 NSWLR 80 Meehan v Glazier Holdings Pty Ltd [2002] NSWCA 22; (2002) 54 NSWLR 146 Miller v Cameron [1936] HCA 13; (1936) 54 CLR 572. Milltec Australia Pty Ltd v Burnes [2006] NSWCA 13 CASES CITED: Moses v Macferlan (1760) 2 Burr 1005; 97 ER 676 Northey v Juul [2005] NSWSC 933 Northey v Juul [2008] NSWSC 275 Northey v Juul (Supreme Court of New South Wales, Macready AsJ, 13 June 2008, unreported) Northey v Juul (Supreme Court of New South Wales, Macready AsJ, 23 July 2008, unreported) Osborne v Smith [1960] HCA 89; (1960) 105 CLR 153 Ovidio Carrideo Nominees Pty Ltd v The Dog Depot Pty Ltd [2006] VSCA 6; (2006) V Conv R 54-713 Perpetual Trustee Co v Watson (No 1) (1927) 28 SR (NSW) 39 Pit v Cholmondeley (1754) 2 Ves Sen 565; 28 ER 360 Port of Melbourne Authority v Anshun Pty Ltd [1981] HCA 45; (1981) 147 CLR 589 Ramsay v Pigram [1968] HCA 34; (1968) 118 CLR 271 Re Beddoe [1893] 1 Ch 547 Re Brier (1884) 26 Ch D 238 Re Brogden (1888) 38 Ch D 546 Re Dallaway [1982] 1 WLR 756; [1982] 3 All ER 118 Re Stevens [1897] 1 Ch 422 Re Stevens [1898] 1 Ch 162 Re Symons (1882) 21 Ch D 757 Re Tebbs [1976] 2 All ER 858 Re Wrightson [1908] 1 Ch 789 Re Youngs (1885) 30 Ch D 421 Richards v Cornford (No 3) [2010] NSWCA 134 Richardson v Rearden [2006] NSWSC 1252 Roxborough v Rothmans of Pall Mall Australia Ltd [2001] HCA 68; (2001) 208 CLR 516 Royal Bank of Canada v The King [1913] AC 283 Seltsam Pty Ltd v Gahleb [2005] NSWCA 208; (2005) 3 DDCR 1 Sleight v Lawson (1857) 3 K & J 292; 69 ER 1119 Smith v Armitage (1883) 24 Ch D 727 State Rail Authority of New South Wales v Earthline Constructions Pty Ltd (in liq) [1999] HCA 3; (1999) 73 ALJR 306 Westdeutsche Landesbank Girozentrale v Islington London Borough Council [1996] AC 669 Yates Property Corporation Pty Ltd (in liq) v Darling Harbour Authority (1991) 24 NSWLR 156 Young v Holloway [1895] P 87
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate