NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Hamod v State of New South Wales (No 11) [2008] NSWSC 967
HEARING DATE(S) : 16 September 2008
JUDGMENT DATE : 17 September 2008
JUDGMENT OF : Harrison J
DECISION : Application dismissed
CATCHWORDS : JUDGES – disqualification – apprehended bias – conduct of judge in relation to litigant in person
CATEGORY : Procedural and other rulings
Aussie Airlines Pty Ltd v Australian Airlines Pty Ltd [1996] FCA 1308; (1996) 65 FCR 215 British American Tobacco Australia Ltd v Gordon [2007] NSWSC 109 Ebner v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy [2000] HCA 63; (2000) 205 CLR 337 Idoport Pty Ltd v National Australia Bank Ltd [2004] NSWSC 270 Jae Kyung Lee v Bob Chae-Sang Cha [2008] NSWCA 13 CASES CITED : Johnson v Johnson [2000] HCA 48; (2000) 201 CLR 488 Kartinyeri v Commonwealth [1998] HCA 22; (1998) 195 CLR 337 Laws v Australian Broadcasting Tribunal [1990] HCA 31; (1990) 170 CLR 70 Raybos Australia Ltd v Tectran Corporation Pty Ltd (1986) 6 NSWLR 272 Re JRL; Ex parte CJL [1986] HCA 39; (1986) 161 CLR 342 Vakauta v Kelly [1989] HCA 44; (1989) 167 CLR 568
Anthony Hamod (First Plaintiff) PARTIES : Hamock Investments Pty Ltd (Second Plaintiff) State of New South Wales (First Defendant) UBS Australia Limited (Second Defendant)
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 20147 of 2003
COUNSEL : J E Maconachie QC with M T Hutchings (First Defendant) M R Speakman SC (Second Defendant)
In person (First Plaintiff) SOLICITORS : I V Knight, Crown Solicitor (First Defendant) Allens Arthur Robinson (Second Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate