NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Anthony Magafas & Anor v Peter Carantinos & Ors [2009] NSWSC 1124
HEARING DATE(S) : 19 October 2009 JUDGMENT OF : Bergin CJ in Eq
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 19 October 2009
DECISION : Security for costs ordered
CATCHWORDS : [SECURITY FOR COSTS] - Where assignment of action to corporation with no assets - [ACCOUNTS] - Whether accounting party reasonably characterised as moving party or plaintiff - Whether security should be ordered
Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) LEGISLATION CITED : Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW)
Anthony Magafas & Anor v Peter Carantinos & Ors [2007] NSWSC 416 Gray v BNY Trust Company of Australia Ltd [2009] NSWSC 789 CASES CITED : Idoport Pty Ltd v National Australia Bank Limited [35] [2001] NSWSC 744 Rajski & Anor v Computer Manufacture & Design Pty Ltd & Ors [1982] 2 NSWLR 443 Tomlinson v Land & Finance Corporation Ltd (1884) 14 QBD 539 Willey v Synan (1935) 54 CLR 175
Anthony Magafas (First Plaintiff) PARTIES : Pac-Com Pty Limited (Second Plaintiff) PCM Nominees Pty Ltd (Sixth Defendant)
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 2670 of 2006
COUNSEL : S Golledge (Plaintiffs/Applicants) C Branson QC (Sixth Defendant/Respondent)
SOLICITORS : Rockliffs Solicitors & IP Lawyers (Plaintiffs/Applicants) Bamford Lawyers (Sixth Defendant/Respondent)
- 1 - IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION
BERGIN CJ in Eq
19 OCTOBER 2009
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate