NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : GENE SIMRING v COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, NSW POLICE [2009] NSWSC 270
HEARING DATE(S) : 29 August 2008 (Written submissions - Dec 08)
JUDGMENT DATE : 14 April 2009
JUDGMENT OF : Smart AJ
DECISION : Appeal and Application for Orders dismissed
CATCHWORDS : Freedom of information - Cl 6 of Sch 1 - personal affairs exemption - unreasonable disclosure of information - ADT has no jurisdiction to consider adequacy of search.
Crimes Act 1900 LEGISLATION CITED : Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 Freedom of Information Act 1989 (NSW) Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Vic)
CATEGORY : Principal judgment
Administrative Decisions Tribunal Appeal Panel v Director-General, Department of Commerce & Ors [2008] NSWCA 140 Colakovski v Australian Telecommunications Corporation (1991) 100 ALR 111 Commissioner of Police v District Court of New South Wales (1993) 31 NSWLR 606 Craig v South Australia (1995) 184 CLR 163 CASES CITED : Exp. Hebburn Ltd; Re Kearsely Shire Council (1947) 47 SR (NSW) 416 Mentink v Albeitz [1999] QSC 9 Re Chandra and Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1984) 6 ALN 257 Re Toohey; ex parte Northern Land Council (1981) 151 CLR 170 Victorian Police v Marke [2008] VSCA 218
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 30062/2008
COUNSEL : In person (P) A C Johnson (D)
SOLICITORS : In person (P) State Crown Solicitor (D)
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : Administrative Decisions Tribunal of NSW
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate