NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: Johnson v R, Moody v R [2010] NSWCCA 124
HEARING DATE(S): 21/05/2010
JUDGMENT DATE: 25 June 2010
JUDGMENT OF: James J at 1; Simpson J at 9; Barr AJ at 36
DECISION: In the application of Paul Robert Johnson - grant leave to appeal but dismiss the appeal. In the application of Michael Ronald Moody - grant leave to appeal but dismiss the appeal.
CATCHWORDS: Application for leave to appeal against sentences - multiple offences of robbery armed with a dangerous weapon - whether sentences manifestly excessive
Crimes Act 1900 - ss 95, 97(1), 97(2) LEGISLATION CITED: Firearms Act 1996 - s 7(1) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 - ss 23, 37, Pt 3 Div 3
CATEGORY: Principal judgment
R v Goundar [2001] NSWCCA 198; 127 A Crim R 331 R v JW [2010] NSWCCA 49 R v Breedon (NSWCCA, 3 December 1992, unreported) R v Hoschke [2001] NSWCCA 317 R v Wright [2009] NSWCCA 3 GAS v The Queen [2004] HCA 22; 217 CLR 198 The Queen v Pearce [1998] HCA 57; 194 CLR 610 Attorney General's Application under s 37 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 [2002] NSWCCA 518 CASES CITED : R v McNaughton (2006) 66 NSWLR 566 Veen v The Queen(No 2) (1988) 164 CLR 465 R v Wickham [2004] NSWCCA 193 Hillier v Director of Public Prosecutions [2009] NSWCCA 312 Weininger v The Queen (2003) 212 CLR 629 R v Baleiovalau [2009] NSWCCA 153 R v Ta [2009] NSWCCA 196 R v George (2004) 149 A Crim R 38 R v Henry (1999) 36 NSWLR 346
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate