NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : R v AA, AC, SS, Tatchell & Wildsmith [No 1] [2009] NSWSC 1414
19-21/10/09 16-27/10/09 HEARING DATE(S) : 30/10/09 2-6/10/09 9/11/09
JUDGMENT DATE : 23 November 2009
JURISDICTION : Common Law Criminal Division
JUDGMENT OF : Kirby J
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 9 November 2009
DECISION : Leave given to cross examine under s 38 Evidence Act 1995 in terms of s 192.
CATCHWORDS : CRIMINAL LAW - Procedure - application for leave to cross examine unfavourable witness - hearsay evidence including admissions - Lee's case - s 137 discretion to exclude - whether voir dire or cross examination in front of jury.
LEGISLATION CITED : Evidence Act 1995
CATEGORY : Procedural and other rulings
CASES CITED : Lee v The Queen [1998] HCA 60; (1998) 195 CLR 594
Regina AA PARTIES : AC SS Luke Tatchell David Wildsmith
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 2009/3729; 2009/3746; 2009/3747; 2009/3748; 2009/4327
P Barrett (Crown) J Stratton SC (AA) COUNSEL : R Pontello (AC) M Austin (SS) A Webb (Tatchell) G Brady (Wildsmith)
L Burgoyne - DPP (Crown) K Kyriacou (AA) SOLICITORS : O'Brien Solicitors (AC) J Grix - LAC (SS) S Boyages - ALS (Tatchell) L Premutico (Wildsmith)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate