NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: LOZANOVSKI v R [2009] NSWCCA 123
HEARING DATE(S): 12 February 2009
JUDGMENT DATE: 29 April 2009
JUDGMENT OF: McClellan CJatCL at 1; James J at 2; Adams J at 3
DECISION: 1. Leave to appeal granted. 2. Head sentence is reduced to three years' imprisonment. A non-parole period of one year and nine months to commence on 29 August 2007 and expire on 28 May 2009 is imposed.
CATCHWORDS: Sentence appeal - parity
LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1997 s 44 Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 s 25
CATEGORY: Principal judgment
PARTIES: Jason LOZANOVSKI Regina
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2008/00001204
COUNSEL: C Smith (Applicant) J Dwyer (Respondent)
SOLICITORS: S E O'Connor (Applicant) S Kavanagh (Respondent)
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: District Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): 08/31/0012
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Coolahan DCJ
LOWER COURT DATE OF DECISION: 1 May 2008
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 2008/00001204003
McCLELLAN CJ at CL JAMES J ADAMS J
29 April 2009 LOZANOVSKI v R Judgment
1 McCLELLAN CJ at CL: I agree with Adams J. 2 JAMES J: I agree with Adams J. 3 ADAMS J:
Introduction
The applicant was sentenced in the District Court on 1 May 2008 to a term of imprisonment of three years and nine months with a non-parole period of two years and three months upon the charge that between 27 July and 16 August 2007 at Glendale he did on three or more separate occasions during a period of thirty consecutive days supply methylamphetamine for reward, an offence under s 25A(1) of the Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985. The maximum penalty for this offence is imprisonment for twenty years. The Court on the same date also sentenced his co-offender, Theo Kapsiskis to one charge of supplying an amount of methylamphetamine of not less than the commercial quantity between 27 July and 28 August 2007, contrary to s 25(2) of the Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985. The commercial quantity of methylamphetamine as prescribed in Schedule 1 to the Act is 250 grams or more. This offence carries a maximum of twenty years' imprisonment but also a standard non-parole period of ten years' imprisonment. The co-offender was sentenced to a term of imprisonment of three years and six months with a non-parole period of one year and six months. 4 The applicant seeks leave to appeal against his sentence upon the ground that there is such a substantial disparity in all the circumstances between his sentence and that imposed on the co-offender as to require a reduction of his sentence in the interests of justice.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate