NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: Laalaa v R [2009] NSWCCA 250
HEARING DATE(S): 2 September 2009
JUDGMENT DATE: 2 October 2009
JUDGMENT OF: Tobias JA at 1; Hoeben J at 2; RA Hulme J at 3
DECISION: Extension of time to apply for leave to appeal is refused.
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW - appeal against sentence - supply of large commercial quantity of heroin - assessment of objective seriousness - parity between co-offenders - whether sentence manifestly excessive
LEGISLATION CITED: Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Drugs Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985
CATEGORY: Principal judgment
Attorney General's Application under s 37 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 No 1 of 2002 [2002] NSWCCA 518; (2002) 56 NSWLR 146 EG v Regina [2003] NSWCCA 246 JOD v R [2009] NSWCCA 205 R v AEM Snr, KEM and MM [2002] NSWCCA 58 R v Amurao [2005] NSWCCA 32 R v Attallah [2005] NSWCCA 277 R v Barton [2001] NSWCCA 63 R v Bavadra [2002] NSWCCA 292; (2000) 115 A Crim R 152 CASES CITED : R v Bayeh [2000] NSWCCA 473 R v Chung [2001] NSWCCA 484 R v George (2004) NSWCCA 247; 149 A Crim R 38 R v Knight; R v Biuvanua [2007] NSWCCA 283; 176 A Crim R 338 R v MacDonnell [2002] NSWCCA 34; (2002) 128 A Crim R 44 R v MAK; MSK [2006] NSWCCA 381; (2006) 167 A Crim R 159 R v Morgan (1993) 70 A Crim R 368 R v Panagakos [2003] NSWCCA 81; (2002) 138 A Crim R 538 Vuni v R [2006] NSWCCA 171
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate