NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Citigroup v CrediProtect [2010] NSWSC 1054
HEARING DATE(S) : 6/09/10, 07/09/10, 08/09/10, 09/09/10 and 10/09/10 JURISDICTION : Equity Division Commercial List
JUDGMENT OF : McDougall J at 1
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 10 September 2010
DECISION : Citigroup is entitled to judgment for the amount claimed, and the cross-claim fails.
CATCHWORDS : TRADE PRACTICES - misleading or deceptive conduct - unconscionability - sale of debt book - plaintiff seeking judgment for payment of remaining instalment of purchase price - where second and third defendants guaranteed obligations of first defendant - cross-claim - whether plaintiff engaged in misleading or deceptive conduct - whether alleged representatives made - whether deed of sale and deed of guarantee obtained by unconscionable conduct. - CONTRACTS - whether negligent misrepresentations made.
LEGISLATION CITED : Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth)
CATEGORY : Principal judgment
Blomley v Ryan (1956) 99 CLR 362 Commercial Bank of Australia Limited v Amadio (1983) 151 CLR 447 CASES CITED : Louth v Diprose (1999) 175 CLR 621 Nguyen v Cosmopolitan Homes [2008] NSWCA 246 Turner v Windever [2003] NSWSC 1147 Watson v Foxman (1995) 49 NSWLR 315
Citigroup Pty Limited (First Plaintiff / Cross Defendant) PARTIES : CrediProtect Pty Ltd (First Defendant / First Cross-Claimant) Michelle Bubke (Second Defendant / Second Cross-Claimant) National Receivables Group Pty Ltd (Third Defendant / Third Cross-Claimant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate