NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : R v Floyd Leslie DOWLEY [2009] NSWSC 722
HEARING DATE(S) : 27 March 2009, 22 May 2009
JUDGMENT DATE : 30 July 2009
JUDGMENT OF : Hidden J
DECISION : Manslaughter: Imprisonment for 11 years, NPP 7 years, from 24 .11.07. (Deemed) larceny of motor vehicle: FT 12 months from 24.11.07.
CATCHWORDS : CRIMINAL LAW: - manslaughter - plea of guilty - killing by stabbing of de facto partner - substantial impairment - drug abuse
Crimes Act 1900 LEGISLATION CITED : Criminal Procedure Act 1986 Mental Health (Criminal Procedure) Act 1990 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999
CATEGORY : Principal judgment
PARTIES : REGINA (Crown) Floyd Leslie DOWLEY (Offender)
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 2008/13851
COUNSEL : P Ingram (Crown) P Pearsall (Offender)
SOLICITORS : S Kavanagh (Solicitor for Public Prosecutions) (Crown) S O'Connor (Legal Aid Commission) (Offender)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION
HIDDEN J
Thursday 30 July 2009
2008/13851 Floyd Leslie DOWLEY
REMARKS ON SENTENCE 1 HIS HONOUR: The offender, Floyd Leslie Dowley, has pleaded guilty to the manslaughter of his partner, Susan Knott, at Berkeley on 24 November 2007. That plea was accepted by the Crown in satisfaction of an indictment for murder. The basis of the plea is substantial impairment by abnormality of mind: s 23A of the Crimes Act 1900. He stands for sentence for that offence. I am also asked to deal with a related offence of deemed larceny of a motor vehicle on a certificate under s 166 of the Criminal Procedure Act 1986. This arises from his taking and driving a vehicle, also at Berkeley, without the consent of its owner: s 154A(1) of the Crimes Act.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate