NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision: 76 NSWLR 572
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: RICHARDS v CORNFORD [2010] NSWCA 99
HEARING DATE(S): 5 May 2010
JUDGMENT DATE: 10 May 2010
JUDGMENT OF: Allsop ACJ at 1; McColl JA at 2; Basten JA at 3
(1) Allow the appeal and set aside order 4, being a judgment for the plaintiff in an amount of $772,818. DECISION: (2) In place of order 4, give judgment for the plaintiff in the sum of $959,670 to date from 7 May 2009. (3) Order that the respondents pay the appellant's costs of the appeal.
CATCHWORDS: COURTS - civil - District Court of New South Wales - jurisdiction - amount claimed in excess of jurisdictional limit - whether amount must be specified - whether in statement of claim or particulars - whether jurisdiction extended by lack of objection - PROCEDURE - pleading amount claimed - not permitted where claim for unliquidated damages - STATUTORY INTERPRETATION – ambiguous provisions – consent jurisdiction under District Court Act 1973 (NSW) s 51 – whether notice of a claim in excess of the jurisdictional limit must be given in the statement of claim - WORDS & PHRASES - "amount claimed" - "jurisdictional limit"
Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), 23 LEGISLATION CITED: District Court Act 1973 (NSW), ss 4, 44, 49, 50, 51, 76 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 14.13, Pt 14
CATEGORY: Principal judgment
Bebe v Woolworths Ltd (unrep, 11 July 2008) CASES CITED: Mannai Investments Co Ltd v Eagle Star Life Assurance Co Ltd [1997] AC 749 Nichols v Patrick Stevedoring Co Pty Ltd [1979] 2 NSWLR 457 Woodward Pty Ltd v Kelleher [1989] NSWCA 82
Danielle Richards (Appellant) PARTIES: Ian Cornford (First Respondent) Taringha House Pty Ltd (Second Respondent) QBE Insurance (Australia) Ltd (Third Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate