NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Hamod v State of New South Wales (No 12) [2009] NSWSC 242
HEARING DATE(S) : 2 - 20 June 2008; 8 - 10 and 15 - 17 September 2008; final submissions 21 October 2008
JUDGMENT DATE : 3 April 2009
JUDGMENT OF : Harrison J
DECISION : 1. Verdict for the first defendant. 2. Verdict for the second defendant.
CATCHWORDS : TORTS – wrongful arrest and false imprisonment - malicious prosecution - absence of reasonable and probable cause for prosecution – whether reasonable basis for prosecutor's belief - injurious falsehood – conspiracy to injure by lawful means – conspiracy to injure by unlawful means – where first plaintiff arrested following investigation by police into allegations that he was in possession of a bogus certificate of guarantee for 4590 tonnes of platinum – where first plaintiff attempting to sell the certificate – where first plaintiff charged under Crimes Act 1900 s 178BB that he made a statement about the legitimate title to the certificate which he knew to be false or misleading in a material particular – where first plaintiff imprisoned for seven months – subsequently acquitted by magistrate – whether plaintiffs established malice and absence of reasonable and probable cause for prosecution
LEGISLATION CITED : Crimes Act 1900 Criminal Procedure Act 1986
CATEGORY : Principal judgment
A v New South Wales [2007] HCA 10; (2007) 230 CLR 500 Adams v Kennedy [2000] NSWCA 152; (2000) 49 NSWLR 78 Ali v Nationwide News Pty Ltd [2008] NSWCA 183 Attorney-General for New South Wales v Perpetual Trustee Company Limited (1954) 92 CLR 113 Australian Wool Innovation Ltd v Newkirk [2005] FCA 290; (2005) ATPR 42-053 Browne v Dunn (1893) 6 R 67 Cabassi v Vila [1940] HCA 41; (1940) 64 CLR 130 Christie v Leachinsky [1947] AC 573 Collins v Wilcock [1984] 1 WLR 1172 Commonwealth v Griffiths [2007] NSWCA 370; (2007) 70 NSWLR 268 Cox v Journeaux (No 2) [1935] HCA 48; (1935) 52 CLR 713 Crofter Hand Woven Harris Tweed Company Limited v Veitch [1942] AC 435 Director of Public Prosecutions v Puskar (Supreme Court of New South Wales, Newman J, 9 July 1992, unreported) Dresna Pty Ltd v Misu Nominees Pty Ltd [2004] FCAFC 169 Enever v R [1906] HCA 3; (1906) 3 CLR 969 Fatimi Pty Ltd v Bryant [2004] NSWCA 140; (2004) 59 NSWLR 678 Fleet v District Court of NSW [1999] NSWCA 363 George v Rockett [1990] HCA 26; (1990) 170 CLR 104 CASES CITED : Lonrho Plc v Al-Fayed [1992] 1 AC 448 Mann v O'Neill [1997] HCA 28; (1997) 191 CLR 204 Marrinan v Vibart [1963] 1 QB 234 McKernan v Fraser [1931] HCA 54; (1931) 46 CLR 343 McWilliam v Penthouse Publications Ltd [2001] NSWCA 237 New South Wales v Tyszyk [2008] NSWCA 107 Northern Territory v Mengel [1995] HCA 65; (1995) 185 CLR 307 Palmer-Bruyn & Parker Pty Ltd v Parsons [2001] HCA 69; (2001) 208 CLR 388 R v Beydoun (1990) 22 NSWLR 256 R v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis; Ex Parte Blackburn [1968] 2 QB 118 R v Rogerson [1992] HCA 25; (1992) 174 CLR 268 Spencer v Australian Capital Territory [2007] NSWSC 303 State of New South Wales v Delly [2007] NSWCA 303; (2007) 70 NSWLR 125 The Mentone Racing Club v The Victorian Railways Commissioner (1902) 28 VLR 77 Thomas v State of New South Wales [2008] NSWCA 316; White v Baycorp Advantage Business Information Services Ltd [2006] NSWSC 441 Williams v Hursey [1959] HCA 51; (1959) 103 CLR 30 Womboin Pty Ltd v Reichelt (Supreme Court of New South Wales, Windeyer J, 25 August 1995, unreported) Zavarinos v State of New South Wales [2004] NSWCA 320; (2004) 62 NSWLR 58
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate