NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision: 196 A Crim R 145
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: GRENFELL, Richard Gerald v R [2009] NSWCCA 162
HEARING DATE(S): 2 June 2009
JUDGMENT DATE: 12 June 2009
JUDGMENT OF: Campbell JA at 1; Latham J at 9; Harrison J at 10
DECISION: Leave to appeal granted. Appeal dismissed.
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW – sentencing – applicant pleaded guilty to social security fraud committed over 28 year period involving creation of false identity and in excess of $200,000 – applicant 77 years old and suffering from progressive optic atrophy, hypertensive nephrosclerosis and lumbo sacral degeneration - effective non-parole period of 2 years 8 months for all counts to be served concurrently – whether sentencing judge erred in failing to consider legislative change concerning s 29D of the Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) and s 135.1(2) of the Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) – whether insufficient weight given to applicant's medical condition and disabilities – whether sentences manifestly excessive – no error found.
Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) LEGISLATION CITED: Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) Criminal Code Amendment (Theft, Fraud, Bribery and Related Offences) Act 1999 (Cth)
CATEGORY: Principal judgment
Charkawi v R [2008] NSWCCA 159 Bick v R [2006] NSWCCA 408 R v De Vroome (1987) 38 A Crim R 146 R v Hinton [2002] NSWCCA 405, (2002) 134 A Crim R 286 R v Keir [2004] NSWCCA 106 CASES CITED : R v Purdon (Court of Criminal Appeal, 27 March 1997, unreported) R v Ronen [2006] NSWCCA 123, (2006) 161 A Crim R 300 R v Smith (1987) 44 SASR 587 R v Sopher (1993) 70 A Crim R 570 Rutkowskyj v R [2008] NSWCCA 10 SZ v R [2007] NSWCCA 19, (2007) 168 A Crim R 249 TYN v R [2009] NSWCCA 146
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate