NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Perpetual Nominees Limited v Taouk & Anor [2009] NSWSC 605
HEARING DATE(S) : 09/06/2009
JUDGMENT DATE : 2 July 2009
JUDGMENT OF : Hoeben J
DECISION : Apart from orders 1-4 and 7-12 the orders of the Registrar made on 4 June 2009 are discharged. That part of the plaintiff's Notice of Motion relating to asset preservation orders and the extension of caveat AE111568 is dismissed. Plaintiff to pay Mr Taouk's costs of the hearing before me on 9 June 2009.
CATCHWORDS : Real property - application to extend caveat - whether plaintiff has a caveatable interest - Injunction - freezing order - whether danger that if plaintiff succeeds it will not be able to have its judgment satisfied - adequacy of evidence.
LEGISLATION CITED : Real Property Act 1900 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005
CATEGORY : Principal judgment
Finn v Carelli [2007] NSWSC 261 Frigo v Culhaci (NSWCA 17 July 1998, unreported) CASES CITED : Newcastle City Council v Caverstock Group Pty Limited [2008] NSWCA 249 Patterson v BTR Engineering (Aust) Ltd (1989) 18 NSWLR 319 at 321-322 Perpetual Nominees v Springfield Retail Pty Ltd [2009] NSWSC 188 Vaughan v Duncan [2007] NSWSC 811
Perpetual Nominees Limited - Plaintiff PARTIES : Karam Elias Taouk - First Defendant Jim George - Second Defendant
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 11740/2009
COUNSEL : Ms L Young - Plaintiff Mr CN Bova - First Defendant
SOLICITORS : Bartier Perry - Plaintiff Marque Lawyers - First Defendant
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate