NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: Croker v Attorney General of New South Wales [2010] NSWCA 355
HEARING DATE(S): 10 December 2010
JUDGMENT DATE: 10 December 2010
JUDGMENT OF: Allsop ACJ at 1; McColl JA at 4
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE: 10 December 2010
DECISION: Application for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs. [Note: The Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 provide (Rule 36.11) that unless the Court otherwise orders, a judgment or order is taken to be entered when it is recorded in the Court's computerised court record system. Setting aside and variation of judgments or orders is dealt with by Rules 36.15, 36.16, 36.17 and 36.18. Parties should in particular note the time limit of fourteen days in Rule 36.16.]
CATCHWORDS: APPEAL - civil - application for leave to appeal - vexatious litigant
LEGISLATION CITED: Vexatious Proceedings Act 2008 (NSW), s 8(7)(b)
CATEGORY: Principal judgment
PARTIES: Clayton Robert Croker (Applicant) Attorney General of New South Wales (Respondent)
FILE NUMBER(S): CA 2010/275605
COUNSEL: In person (Applicant) D Ward (Respondent)
SOLICITORS: In person (Applicant) Crown Solicitor of New South Wales (Respondent)
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: Supreme Court - Common Law Division
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): 2010/20153
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Fullerton J
LOWER COURT DATE OF DECISION: 22 August 2010
LOWER COURT MEDIUM NEUTRAL CITATION: Attorney General of New South Wales v Croker [2010] NSWSC 942
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL 2010/275605
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate