NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: WORKERS COMPENSATION (DUST DISEASES) BOARD OF NSW v SMITH, MUNRO AND SEYMOUR [2010] NSWCA 19
HEARING DATE(S): 16, 17 and 19 November 2009
JUDGMENT DATE: 23 February 2010
JUDGMENT OF: Allsop P at 1; Basten JA at 8; Handley AJA at 162
DECISION: (1) Dismiss each of the appeals in respect of the decisions of the District Court. (2) Order that the appellant pay the respondents' costs of the appeals.
CATCHWORDS: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – procedural fairness – adequacy of reasons – factual finding of causation from asbestos in combination with tobacco smoke – whether necessary to attempt to set out arithmetical foundation of finding – whether decision on question of law - APPEAL – civil – statutory appeal – appeal from District Court – appeal against award of the Court in point of law – distinction between point of law, admission of evidence and findings of fact - EVIDENCE – admissibility and relevance – opinion evidence – basis rule – whether basis for opinion identified – whether explicit ruling on objection to evidence necessary - EVIDENCE – weight and sufficiency of evidence – uncontradicted evidence – affidavit evidence of deceased claimants – similarities between affidavits – whether unreliability resulted in unfair prejudice to defendant – Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), s 135 - STATUTORY INTERPRETATION – construction of composite provision – dual limbs – second limb grammatically ambiguous – nature of causal connection envisaged by words "reasonably attributable to" – whether words introduce normative component to determination of statutory entitlement – Workers' Compensation (Dust Diseases) Act 1942 (NSW), s 8(1)(b) - TORTS – negligence – causation – dust diseases – asbestos – tobacco – exposure to both carcinogens – development of lung cancer – whether exposure to asbestos constituted material contribution to carcinoma - WORDS & PHRASES – "asbestosis" – "award of the court in point of law" – "dust disease" – "Helsinki criteria" – "lung cancer" – "material contribution" – "reasonably attributable" – "relative risk"
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate