NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Ryan KAPRAL v Federal Agent Joshua BUNTING [2009] NSWSC 749
HEARING DATE(S) : 20/07/2009
JUDGMENT DATE : 3 August 2009
JUDGMENT OF : Howie J at 1
DECISION : The appeal is dismissed. The plaintiff is to pay the defendant's costs.
CATCHWORDS : Criminal Law - Practice and Procedure - Investigatory powers - Forensic sample - whether magistrate ought to have granted order for taking of buccal swab - Appeal - appeal from magistrate - whether error of law.
Crimes (Forensic Procedures) Act 2000 - s 24, 115A(1) LEGISLATION CITED : Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 - s 25(2) Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 - ss 52, 53
CATEGORY : Principal judgment
Orban v Bayliss [2004] NSWSC 428 CASES CITED : International Finance Trust Company Limited v NSW Crimes Commission [2008] NSWCA 291 Collector of Customs v Agfa-Gevaert Ltd [1996] HCA 36; 186 CLR 389 George v Rockett (1990) 170 CLR 104
PARTIES : Ryan Kapral v Federal Agent Joshua Bunting
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 011891/09
COUNSEL : B Clark - Plaintiff D Jordan - Defendant
SOLICITORS : Webb Lawyers - Plaintiff Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions - Defendant
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : Local Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 20088583/09/02
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER : Townsden LCM
LOWER COURT DATE OF DECISION : 31/03/2009
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION
HOWIE J
MONDAY 3 AUGUST 2009
011891/09 Ryan KAPRAL v Federal Agent Joshua BUNTING JUDGMENT
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate