NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Dibley v Sydney West Area Health Service [2009] NSWSC 856
HEARING DATE(S) : 25/06/09, 07/08/09
JUDGMENT DATE : 27 August 2009
JUDGMENT OF : James J
DECISION : 1. The limitation period applicable to the cause of action pleaded in the statement of claim is extended up until 31 March 2008. 2. The plaintiff is to pay the defendant's costs of the application but the costs order is not to be enforced prior to final judgment in the action without the leave of the Supreme Court.
CATCHWORDS : Limitation period — application for an extension — whether plaintiff aware of connection between injury and omissions of defendant — costs
LEGISLATION CITED : Limitation Act
Cartledge v E Jopling & Sons Limited [1963] 1 All ER 341 Commonwealth v Lewis [2007] NSWCA 127 Dedousis v The Water Board (1993-1994) 181 CLR 171 Drayton Coal Pty Ltd v Drain (1995) NSWCA 131 CASES CITED : Footner v Broken Hill Associated Smelters Pty Limited (1983) 33 SASR 58 Galea v Commonwealth of Australia (No 2) [2008] NSWSC 260 Holt v Wynter (2000) 49 NSWLR 128 Nixon v Philip Morris (Australia) Limited (1999) 165 ALR 515 Wardley Australia Limited v Western Australia (1992) 175 CLR 514 Williams v Commonwealth of Australia [2007] NSWSC 1342
PARTIES : Renee Roslyn Dibley Sydney West Area Health Service
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 20104/08
COUNSEL : J A Anderson - Plaintiff S G Barnes - Defendant
SOLICITORS : McLaughlin & Riordan Solicitors - Plaintiff General Insurance Law Department - Defendant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate