NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: State of NSW (NSW Police) v Nominal Defendant [2009] NSWCA 225
HEARING DATE(S): 1 May 2009
JUDGMENT DATE: 31 July 2009
JUDGMENT OF: Allsop P at 1; Beazley JA at 2; Macfarlan JA at 113
1. Appeal allowed; 2. Set aside the verdict for the defendant/respondent; DECISION: 3. Set aside orders 2 and 3 made by the trial judge; 4. Order that there be verdict and judgment for the appellant; and 5. Direct the parties to bring in short minutes of order in accordance with these reasons within seven days.
CATCHWORDS: TORTS – negligence – causation – injury during the course of a police pursuit – whether the initiation and continuation of the pursuit broke the chain of causation - TORTS – negligence – police pursuit – contributory negligence – whether the police officer's decision to initiate and continue the pursuit was reasonable – whether the police officer exercised reasonable care for his own safety - TORTS – negligence – damages – future economic loss – Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999, s 126 – parties agreed on approach to Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999, s 126 – assumptions made by trial judge in determining future economic loss – whether assumptions supported by the evidence
Civil Liability Act 2002, s 13 LEGISLATION CITED: Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999, Pt 2.4, s 126 Supreme Court Act 1970, s 75A Workers Compensation Act 1987, s 151Z
CATEGORY: Principal judgment
Bennett v Minister for Community Welfare [1992] HCA 27; (1992) 176 CLR 408 Bresatz v Przibilla [1962] HCA 54; (1962) 108 CLR 541 Chappel v Hart [1998] HCA 55; (1998) 195 CLR 232 Environment Agency v Empress Car Co (Abertillery) Ltd [1998] UKHL 5; [1999] 2 AC 22 Gett v Tabet [2009] NSWCA 76 Glasgow Corporation v Muir [1943] AC 448 Government Insurance Office of New South Wales v Wojnar (Court of Appeal, 15 December 1988, unreported) Graham v Baker [1961] HCA 48; (1961) 106 CLR 340 Hirst v Nominal Defendant [2005] QCA 65; (2005) 2 Qd R 133 Joslyn v Berryman [2003] HCA 34; (2003) 214 CLR 552 Liftronic Pty Ltd v Unver [2001] HCA 24; (2001) 179 ALR 321 CASES CITED: MacArthur Districts Motor Cycle Sportsman Inc v Ardizzone [2004] NSWCA 145; (2004) Aust Torts Reports 81-744 Mahony v J Kruschich (Demolitions) Pty Ltd [1985] HCA 37; (1985) 156 CLR 522 Malec v JC Hutton Pty Ltd [1990] HCA 20; (1990) 169 CLR 638 March v Stramare (E & MH) Pty Ltd [1991] HCA 12; (1991) 171 CLR 506 Medlin v State Government Insurance Commission [1995] HCA 5; (1995) 182 CLR 1 Nestle Australia Ld v McDougall [1998] NSWCA 158 Norris v Blake (by his Tutor Porter) (No 2) (1997) 41 NSWLR 49; (1997) 25 MVR 101 NSW Insurance Ministerial Corporation v Sprengnagel [1995] NSWCA 315 Parks v Penrith City Council [2004] NSWCA 381 Podreberserk v Australian Iron & Steel Pty Ltd [1985] HCA 34; (1985) 59 ALR 529 Reeves v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [1999] UKHL 35; [2000] 1 AC 360 Teubner v Humble [1963] HCA 11; (1963) 108 CLR 491 Wynn v NSW Insurance Ministerial Corporation [1995] HCA 53; (1995) 184 CLR 485
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate