NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: Satchithanantham & Ors v National Australia Bank [2010] NSWCA 243
HEARING DATE(S): 13/09/10
JUDGMENT DATE: 13 September 2010
JUDGMENT OF: Macfarlan JA at 15 & 17; Handley AJA at 1; Sackville AJA at 16
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE: 13 September 2010
DECISION: Order that the three notices of motion filed by the applicants on 7 June, 24 June and 6 August 2010 be dismissed with costs.
CATCHWORDS: ABUSE OF PROCESS – Court not bound to entertain argument where proceedings clearly abusive. - PRACTICE and PROCEDURE – Court not bound to entertain argument where proceedings clearly abusive.
LEGISLATION CITED: Contracts Review Act
CATEGORY: Procedural and other rulings
PARTIES: Hemalathasothy Ranjini SATCHITHANANTHAM (applicant) NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK LIMITED (respondent)
FILE NUMBER(S): CA CA 2009/298148
COUNSEL: Mr Krishnar, solicitor - Applicant Ms N Bearup - Respondent
SOLICITORS: Dibbs Baker - Respondent
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: Supreme Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): 24 May 2010 and various
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Hodgson JA and various
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL 09/298148
MACFARLAN JA HANDLEY AJA SACKVILLE AJA
MONDAY 13 SEPTEMBER 2010
NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK v HEMALATHASOTHY RANIJINI SATCHITHANANTHAM HEMALATHASOTHY RANIJINI SATCHITHANANTHAM v NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK LIMITED
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate