NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision: 193 A Crim R 87
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: Elmir v R [2009] NSWCCA 22
HEARING DATE(S): 10 December 2008
JUDGMENT DATE: 17 February 2009
JUDGMENT OF: Tobias JA at 1; James J at 80; Price J at 81
(a) Appeal against conviction dismissed. DECISION: (b) Grant leave to appeal against sentence. (c) Appeal against sentence dismissed.
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW – jurisdiction, practice and procedure – pleas – general pleas – plea of guilty – whether conviction for an offence was a miscarriage of justice where plea of guilty entered under a belief as to the law applicable to the case which was subsequently overturned - sentence – cumulative sentences – whether accumulation of sentence just and appropriate – relevant factors – hardship to others – whether medical condition of convicted person's wife and subsequent impact on children constituted exceptional circumstances
Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 LEGISLATION CITED: Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 Evidence Act 1995 Law Enforcement (Controlled Operations) Act 1997
CATEGORY: Principal judgment
Cahyadi v The Queen [2007] NSWCCA 1; (2007) 168 A Crim R 41 Dowe v Commissioner of New South Wales Crime Commission [2007] NSWSC 166; (2007) 169 A Crim R 43 Gedeon v Commissioner of New South Wales Commission; Dowe v Commissioner of New South Wales Crime Commission [2008] HCA 43; [2008] 82 ALJR 1465 Hamzy v R (1994) 74 A Crim R 341 House v The King [1936] HCA 40; (1936) 55 CLR 499 Le v R [2006] NSWCCA 136 Maxwell v The Queen [1996] HCA 46; (1996) 184 CLR 501 Meissner v The Queen [1995] HCA 41; (1995) 184 CLR 132 Mill v R [1988] HCA 70; (1988) 166 CLR 59 Pearce v R [1998] HCA 57; (1998) 194 CLR 610 R v Chiron (1980) 1 NSWLR 218 R v Edwards (1996) 90 A Crim R 510 CASES CITED : R v Forde [1923] 2 KB 400 R v Girard [2004] NSWCCA 170 R v Hammoud [2000] NSWCCA 540; (2000) 118 A Crim R 66 R v Hura [2001] NSWCCA 61; (2001) 121 A Crim R 472 R v Khan [2002] NSWCCA 521 R v Murphy [1965] VR 187 R v Myers (2002) NSWCCA 162 R v Rae (No 2) [2005] NSWCCA 380; (2005) 157 A Crim R 182 R v Sagiv (1986) 22 A Crim R 73 R v Togias [2001] NSWCCA 522; (2001) 127 A Crim R 23 R v Toro-Martinez [2000] NSWCCA 216; (2000) 114 A Crim R 533 R v Van [2002] NSWCCA 148; (2002) 129 A Crim R 229 Sauer v R [2006] NSWCCA 81 Woods v R [2008] NSWCCA 83
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate