NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: RADI v R [2010] NSWCCA 265
HEARING DATE(S): 20 October 2010
JUDGMENT DATE: 19 November 2010
JUDGMENT OF: Simpson J at 1; Hoeben J at 9; RA Hulme J at 55
DECISION: Appeal dismissed.
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW - conviction appeal - supply of prohibited drug - issue at trial whether appellant in possession of drugs - whether evidence of bullets found in car of appellant should have been admitted - whether such evidence relevant - whether such evidence went only to tendency towards criminality - whether trial judge should have given a tendency direction - evidence properly admitted and no tendency direction required.
LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW)
CATEGORY: Principal judgment
He Kaw Teh v The Queen [1985] HCA 43; 157 CLR 523 CASES CITED : RG v R [2010] NSWCCA 173 Thompson and Wran v R [1968] HCA 21; 117 CLR 313
PARTIES: Vasil Radi - Appellant Crown - Respondent
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2008/989
COUNSEL: Mr SJ Odgers SC - Appellant PG Ingram SC - Respondent Crown
SOLICITORS: Martin Ricci - Appellant S Kavanagh, Solicitor for Public prosecutions - Respondent Crown
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: District Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): 2008/21/0004
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Sorby DCJ
LOWER COURT DATE OF DECISION: 25 September 2008
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 2008/989
SIMPSON J HOEBEN J RA HULME J
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate