NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: R v Hay; Hay v R [2009] NSWCCA 228
HEARING DATE(S): 19 June 2009
JUDGMENT DATE: 8 September 2009
JUDGMENT OF: Young JA at [1]; Hidden J at [141]; Latham J at [142]
DECISION: (1) The appeal against conviction is dismissed; (2) The Crown appeal against sentence is dismissed; (3) Leave is given to Mr Hay to appeal against sentence; but (4) Mr Hay's appeal against sentence is dismissed.
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW- appeals- conviction appeal- interpretation and application of Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth)- remarks of Crown Prosecutor- whether directions to jury adequate- whether unsafe and unsatisfactory verdict. CRIMINAL LAW- appeals- sentencing- Crown appeal against sentence- inadequacy of sentence. CRIMINAL LAW- appeals- sentencing- severity.
Crimes Act 1914 (Cth), ss 5, 16A, 20BA, 29D, 86(1) LEGISLATION CITED: Criminal Appeal Act 1912, s 6(1) Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth), Div 134 Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth), Divisions 10B, 10BA, ss 124ZAB, 124ZAC
CATEGORY: Principal judgment
Commissioner of Taxation v Faywin Investments Pty Ltd (1990) 22 FCR 461 Commissioner of Taxation v Lau (1984) 6 FCR 202 (FC) Coppleson v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1981) 34 ALR 377; 52 FLR 95 Equuscorp Pty Ltd v Glengallan Investments Pty Ltd [2004] HCA 55; 218 CLR 471 Everett v The Queen [1944] HCA 49; 181 CLR 295 Faywin Investments Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1989) 89 ALR 599 Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Coppleson (1981) 39 ALR 30; 57 FLR 234 Griffiths v The Queen [1977] HCA 44; 137 CLR 293 Hitch v Stone (2001) 73 TC 600 ICT Pty Ltd v Sea Containers Ltd (1995) 39 NSWLR 640 M v The Queen [1994] HCA 63; 181 CLR 487 McCullough v R (1982) 6 A Crim R 274 Paintin and Nottingham Ltd v Miller Gale and Winter [1971] NZLR 164 Pearce v R (2005) 216 ALR 690 Quinlan v R [2006] NSWCCA 284 R v Cook [2004] NSWCCA 52 CASES CITED : R v DDR [1998] 3 VR 580 R v Harris (2007) 171 A Crim R 267 Reg v Hay [1968] Qd R 459 R v Heyde (1990) 20 NSWLR 234 R v Kopa; Ex parte Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) (2004) 206 ALR 197 R v Lucas [1981] 1 QB 720 R v M [1991] 2 Qd R 68 R v House (1921) 16 Cr App Rep 49 R v Roulston [1976] 2 NZLR 644 R v Stitt (1998) 102 A Crim R 428 R v Teasdale [2004] NSWCCA 91 R v Verma (1987) 30 A Crim R 441 R v Wall [2002] NSWCCA 42 R v Wheeler [2000] NSWCCA 34 Raftland Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (2008) 82 ALJR 934 Sharrment Pty Ltd v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy (1988) 18 FCR 449 Snook v London and West Riding Investments Ltd [1967] 2 QB 786
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate