NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: Cornwell v R [2010] NSWCCA 59
HEARING DATE(S): 20-21 October 2008 30 June 2009
JUDGMENT DATE: 8 April 2010
JUDGMENT OF: McClellan CJatCL at 1; Simpson J at 237; Johnson J at 383
DECISION: 1. Appeal against conviction dismissed. 2. Grant leave to appeal against sentence but dismiss that appeal.
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW - appeal - construction by trial judge of evidence as an admission tendered against interests of the accused and version of facts - direction by trial judge related to the conspiracy - trial judge summing up directions - whether verdict of jury is unreasonable - whether trial judge erred in refusing to grant access to the information on oath by a Federal Agent - whether trial judge overstated applicant's role and involvement in the offence - whether applicant has a legitimate sense of grievance for sentence imposed - whether trial of the applicant miscarried due to non-disclosure or late disclosure of material relevant to defence - whether trial judge wrongly refused applicant access to undisclosed material
Customs Act 1901 (Cth) Evidence Act 1995 LEGISLATION CITED: Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) Surveillances Devices Act 2004 Criminal Appeal Act,1912
CATEGORY: Principal judgment
Attorney General (NSW) v Chidgey [2008] NSWCCA 65; 182 A Crim R 536 Burrell v The Queen [2008] HCA 34; [2008] 238 CLR 218 Cornwell v R [2006] NSWCCA 116; (2006) 160 A Crim R 243 Cornwell v R [2007] HCA 12; (2007) 231 CLR 260 DJL re Central Authority (2001) 201 CLR 226 Dominguez v R (1985) 63 ALR 181 Elliott v The Queen; Blessington v the Queen [2007] HCA 51; (2007) 234 CLR 38 Gipp v R [1998] HCA 21; (1998) 194 CLR 106 HML v R [2008] HCA 16; 235 CLR 334 Peacock v The King (1911) 13 CLR 619 R v Brown (Winston) [1998] AC 367 R v Cornwell [2003] NSWSC 97; (2003) 57 NSWLR 82 R v Duncan (1981) 73 Cr. App. R. 359 R v Haddad [2000] NSWCCA 351; (2000) 116 A Crim R 312 CASES CITED : R v IK [2004] SASC 280; (2004) 89 SASR 406 R v Karageorge (1998) 103 A Crim R 157 R v Keane [1994] 1 WLR 746; [1994] 2 All ER 478 R v Meher [2004] NSWCCA 355 R v Reardon (No 2) [2004] NSWCCA 197; (2004) 60 NSWLR 454 R v Saleam [1999] NSWCCA 86 R v Schmahl [1965] VR 745 R v Spiteri [2004] NSWCCA 321 R v Veverka [1978] 1 NSWLR 478 R v Weiss (No 2) [2006] VSCA 161; 164 A Crim R 454 Saleam v R (1989) 16 NSWLR 14 The Queen v Hiller [2007] HCA 13; [2007] CLR 618 Travel Compensation Fund v Blair [2002] NSWSC 1228 Weiss v The Queen [2005] HCA 81; (2005) 224 CLR 300 Wills v R (1985) 39 SASR 35; (1985) 16 A Crim R 247
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate