NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Micha International Pty Limited v Jong Seol Lee [2008] NSWSC 921
HEARING DATE(S) : 12 August 2008 JUDGMENT OF : Hammerschlag J
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 12 August 2008
DECISION : Statutory Demand dated 16 January 2008 set aside. Defendant to pay the plaintiff's costs.
CATCHWORDS : CORPORATIONS – creditor's statutory demand - application under s 459G of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ("the Act") to set aside statutory demand – plaintiff asserts payment of debt – sufficient evidence to establish genuine dispute
LEGISLATION CITED : Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)
CASES CITED : Solarite Air Conditioning Pty Limited v York International Australia Pty Limited [2002] NSWSC
PARTIES : Micha International Pty Limited (ACN 117 440 098) Jong Seol Lee
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 1507/2008
COUNSEL : J.R. Young (Plaintiff) M.W. Sneddon (Defendant)
SOLICITORS : Sean Kim Bilias & Associates (Plaintiff) Watson & Watson (Defendant)
- 3 - IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION CORPORATIONS LIST
HAMMERSCHLAG J
12 AUGUST 2008
1507/2008 MICHA INTERNATIONAL PTY LIMITED -V- JONG SEOL LEE EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT 1 HIS HONOUR: This is an application under s 459G of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ("the Act") to set aside a statutory demand dated 16 January 2008 made by the defendant on the plaintiff for $110,000. That amount is the balance which the defendant says is outstanding by the plaintiff in respect of the sale by the defendant to the plaintiff of a convenience store business for a purchase price of $360,000 of which $300,000 was attributed to the business and $60,000 to the stock. 2 It is not in dispute that the defendant received on behalf of the plaintiff (from the two individuals who stand behind it) $250,000. Hence the balance of $110,000, allegedly, outstanding. 3 By her affidavit of 15 February 2008, the sole director and shareholder of the plaintiff, Kyung Sook Lim, deposes as follows: "17. I met the Defendant in Seoul Korea on or about 5 January 2006. I saw him a number of times after that. On 23 January 2006 I handed the Defendant the amount of 80 Million Won in Korean currency. This is equivalent to $110,000 in Australian currency.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate