NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Itaoui v Yamaha Motor Finance Australia Pty Ltd [2009] NSWSC 1363 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S) : 30 November 2009
JUDGMENT DATE : 9 December 2009
JUDGMENT OF : Schmidt J
CATCHWORDS : APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL - appeal - whether appeal raises questions of law - sale of goods - whether claimed transactions established - documentary evidence - section 183 of the Evidence Act 1995 - Jones v Dunkel inferences - whether nemo dat quad non habit rule arose - appeal dismissed
Evidence Act 1995 Factors (Mercantile Agents) Act 1923 LEGISLATION CITED : Local Court Act 2007 Registration of Interest in Goods Act 1986 Sale of Goods Act 1923
CATEGORY : Principal judgment
Associated Midland Corporation v Sanderson Motors Pty Ltd and Anor [1983] 3 NSWLR 395 BishopsGate Motor Finance Corporation Ltd v Transport Brakes Ltd [1949] 1 KB 322 CASES CITED : Jones v Dunkel (1958) 101 CLR 298 Jovic v Lamont [2007] NSWCA 47 Manly Council v Byrne and Anor [2004] NSWCA 123 RPS v R [2000] HCA 3; (200) 199 CLR 620
PARTIES : Khaled Itaoui - Appellant Yamaha Motor Finance Australia Pty Ltd - Respondent
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 12849/2009
COUNSEL : Appellant - Mr CRC Newlands SC with Ms JP Muir, counsel Respondent - Mr AJ Bulley, counsel
SOLICITORS : Appellant - Joseph G Capogreco & Associates Respondent - Dibbs Barker
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate