NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision: 202 A Crim R 195
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: R v Wing Cheong Li, Wing Cheong Li v R [2010] NSWCCA 125
HEARING DATE(S): 19/05/2010
JUDGMENT DATE: 25 June 2010
JUDGMENT OF: Allsop P at 1; Basten JA at 2; McClellan CJatCL at 3; Simpson J at 6; Barr AJ at 7
The Crown appeal is dismissed. DECISION: Leave granted to the applicant to appeal against his sentence. Appeal is dismissed.
CATCHWORDS: Crown appeal against sentence - whether sentence inadequate - Application for leave to appeal against sentence - money laundering - whether sentence manifestly excessive
Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) - s 16A LEGISLATION CITED: Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) - Part 10.2 subs 400.2, 400.3(1), 400.4, 400.5, 400.6, 400.7 Financial Transaction Reports Act
CATEGORY: Principal judgment
R v Ansari [2007] NSWCCA 204 R v Huang [2007] NSWCCA 259R v Byrne (2010) QCA 33 R v Trandy, Nguyen & Ors [2009] VSCA 321 Maldonado v R [2009] NSWCCA 189 R v Jimmy [2010] NSWCCA 60 R v Siu [2007] NSWCCA 259 R v Viana [2008] NSWCCA 188 R v Chen [2009] NSWCCA 66 R v George [2004] NSWCCA 247 Postiglione v The Queen [1997] HCA 26 CASES CITED : R v Kerr [2003] NSWCCA 234 Lowe v The Queen (1984) 154 CLR 606 R v Wurramarbra (1979) 1 A Crim R 291 R v Gibson (1991) 56 A Crim R 1 R v Glen Robertson Watson (NSW CCA, 25/2/92) R v Howard & Others (1992) 29 NSWLR 242 R v Karkouer [2999] WASCA 147 R v Formosa [2005] NSWCCA 363 Pham v R [2009] NSWCCA 25 R v Woodgate [2009] NSCCA 137 R v Rajapaski [2001] NSWCCA 126
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate