NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : State of New South Wales v Thomas (Interim) [2009] NSWSC 1119
HEARING DATE(S) : 20 October 2009
JUDGMENT DATE : 20 October 2009
JUDGMENT OF : R A Hulme J
DECISION : Psychiatrists appointed to examine and report; interim detention order made.
CATCHWORDS : CRIMINAL LAW - serious sex offender - preliminary hearing - application for interim detention order or interim supervision order pending final hearing - prior breach of extended supervision order
LEGISLATION CITED : Crimes Act 1900 Crimes (Serious Sex Offenders) Act 2006
Attorney General (NSW) v Hayter [2007] NSWSC 983 Attorney Geneeral (New South Wales) v Tillman [2007] NSWCA 119 Attorney General (NSW) v Winters [2007] NSWSC 1071; 176 A Crim R 249 CASES CITED : Cornwall v Attorney General (NSW) [2007] NSWCA 374 State of New South Wales v Manners [2008] NSWSC 1242 State of New South Wales v Thomas [2008] NSWSC 1340 The State of NSW v Fisk [2009] NSWSC 778 Tillman v Attorney General (NSW) [2007] NSWCA 327; 70 NSWLR 448
PARTIES : The State of New South Wales (Plaintiff) Bruce Malcolm THOMAS (Defendant)
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 14697/09
COUNSEL : Mr D Staehli SC with Ms S Callan (Plaintiff) Mr M Dennis (Defendant)
SOLICITORS : I V Knight (Crown Solicitor) (Plaintiff) Peter Murphy (Defendant)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION
R A Hulme J
20 October 2009
14697/09 The State of New South Wales v Bruce Malcolm THOMAS
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate