NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: Hristovksi v R [2010] NSWCCA 129
HEARING DATE(S): 2 June 2010
JUDGMENT DATE: 23 June 2010
JUDGMENT OF: McClellan CJatCL at 1; Grove J at 2; Johnson J at 3
DECISION: Leave to appeal against sentence granted. Appeal dismissed.
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW - sentence - supply large commercial quantities of MDMA and amphetamine - supply commercial quantity of MDMA - possession of pistol - standard non-parole period offences - whether error in assessment of objective seriousness of offences - whether sentences manifestly excessive - sentences entirely concurrent - no error in assessment of objective seriousness - relevance to assessment of objective seriousness of drug supply offences that supplier in possession of loaded pistol - sentences not manifestly excessive - fixed terms of imprisonment imposed for two standard non-parole offences in breach of s.45(1) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 - no ground of appeal relying on this error - no power of Court of Criminal Appeal to intervene unless s.6(3) or s.7(1A) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 apply - erroneous sentences not invalid - error may be corrected under s.43 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 - appeal dismissed
Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 LEGISLATION CITED: Firearms Act 1996 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999
CATEGORY: Principal judgment
R v Way [2004] NSWCCA 131; 60 NSWLR 168 Forbes v R [2009] NSWCCA 292 Ali v R [2010] NSWCCA 35 Dunn v R [2010] NSWCCA 128 R v McEvoy [2010] NSWCCA 110 R v Lee [2007] NSWCCA 234 Ly v R [2008] NSWCCA 262 Vu v R [2006] NSWCCA 188 Thalari v R [2009] NSWCCA 170 R v Morgan (1993) 70 A Crim R 368 R v Lao [2003] NSWCCA 315 Markarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25; 228 CLR 357 CASES CITED : R v OPA [2004] NSWCCA 464 R v XX [2009] NSWCCA 115 R v Stankovic [2006] NSWCCA 229 R v Nikolic [2007] NSWCCA 232 R v Stricke [2007] NSWCCA 179 R v Knight and Biyvanua [2007] NSWCCA 283; 176 A Crim R 338 R v Gao and Lim [2007] NSWCCA 353 R v Rice [2004] NSWCCA 384 Leddin v R [2008] NSWCCA 242 SGJ v R [2008] NSWCCA 258 Aguirre v R [2010] NSWCCA 115 R v Dunn [2004] NSWCCA 346 Project Blue Sky Inc v Australia Broadcasting Authority [1998] HCA 28; 194 CLR 355
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate