NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Adelaide Bank Ltd v Property Builders Pty Ltd & ors [2009] NSWSC 1147 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S) : 22 October 2009
JUDGMENT DATE : 30 October 2009
JUDGMENT OF : R A Hulme J
DECISION : Application for stay of proceedings or further discovery dismissed with costs. Application to set aside notice to produce granted with costs.
CATCHWORDS : PROCEDURE - Discovery and interrogatories - discovery and inspection of documents - adequacy of plaintiff's response - application for stay or further discovery
Corporations Act 2001 LEGISLATION CITED : Conveyancing Act 1919 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules Real Property Act 1900
Adelaide Bank Ltd v Property Builders Pty Ltd [2009] NSWSC 849 Azzi & Ors v Volvo [2006] NSWSC 283 Firns v Tzovara [2006] NSWSC 925 Hamod v State of New South Wales (No8) [2008] NSWSC 125 CASES CITED : National Australia Bank Ltd v Idoport Pty Ltd [2000] NSWCA 8 Nemeth v Reachcord Pty Ltd (1998) 9 BPR 16,577 NM Rural Enterprises Pty Ltd v Rimanui Farms Ltd [2008] NSWSC 472 Proctor & Gamble v Medical Research [2001] NSWSC 183 Queensland Premier Mines Pty Ltd v French [2007] HCA 53; 235 CLR 81
Adelaide Bank Ltd (Plaintiff) PARTIES : Property Builders Pty Ltd (First Defendant) Michael Phontos (Second Defendant) Eurofinance Capital Limited (Third Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate