NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision: 75 NSWLR 307196 A Crim R 398[2010] ALMD 5380
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: Thalari v Regina [2009] NSWCCA 170
HEARING DATE(S): 17 June 2009
JUDGMENT DATE: 26 June 2009
JUDGMENT OF: Young JA at 1; Johnson J at 2; Latham J at 99
1. Appeal against conviction dismissed. DECISION: 2. Leave to appeal against sentence granted. 3. Appeal against sentence dismissed.
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW - conviction appeal - appellant pleaded guilty to unauthorised possession of pistol under s.7(1) Firearms Act 1996 - whether miscarriage of justice arose from plea of guilty - whether s.7(1) offence requires possession of a "prohibited pistol" - appellant possessed a "pistol" which was not a "prohibited pistol" - legislative history of s.7(1) offence - Law Part Code considered - held that s.7(1) required unauthorised possession of "pistol" - no miscarriage of justice - sentences of imprisonment imposed for s.7(1) offence and offences of possession of a loaded firearm in a public place and supply prohibited drug - Form 1 offences - whether sentences manifestly excessive
Firearms Act 1996 Crimes Act 1900 Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 Summary Offences Act 1988 LEGISLATION CITED: Firearms Amendment (Trafficking) Act 2001 Firearms Amendment (Public Safety) Act 2002 Firearms Amendment (Prohibited Pistols) Act 2003 Crimes Legislation Further Amendment Act 2003 Interpretation Act 1987 Criminal Appeal Act 1912
CATEGORY: Principal judgment
R v Boag (1994) 73 A Crim R 35 R v Van (2002) 129 A Crim R 229 Elmir v R [2009] NSWCCA 22 R v Marchando (2000) 110 A Crim R 337 R v Toro-Martinez (2000) 114 A Crim R 533 R v Sewell [2001] NSWCCA 299 Wong v Director of Public Prosecutions (2005) 155 A Crim R 37 R v Liberti (1991) 66 A Crim R 120 R v Parkes [2004] NSWCCA 377 R v SL [2004] NSWCCA 397 Charlesworth v R [2009] NSWCCA 27 Meissner v The Queen (1995) 184 CLR 132 Lodhi v The Queen (2006) 199 FLR 303 R v Tolley [2004] NSWCCA 165 R v Krstic [2005] NSWCCA 391 CASES CITED : R v Najem [2008] NSWCCA 32 Cramp v R [2008] NSWCCA 40 Luu v R [2008] NSWCCA 285 R v Cromarty (2004) 144 A Crim R 515 R v Young (1999) 46 NSWLR 681 R v PLV (2001) 51 NSWLR 736 Beckwith v The Queen (1976) 135 CLR 569 Chanthaboury v R (2007) 176 A Crim R 438 R v Mitchell [2002] NSWCCA 270 R v Amurao [2005] NSWCCA 32 Yang v R [2007] NSWCCA 37 R v AA [2006] NSWCCA 55 Attorney General's Application under s.37 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (No. 1 of 2002) (2002) 56 NSWLR 146 R v Mouloudi [2004] NSWCCA 96 R v Hemsley [2004] NSWCCA 228 R v Hamid (2006) 164 A Crim R 179 Markarian v The Queen (2005) 228 CLR 357
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate