NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: Pollard v RRR Corporation Pty Ltd [2009] NSWCA 110 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S): 28 April 2009
JUDGMENT DATE: 15 May 2009
JUDGMENT OF: Ipp JA at 1; McColl JA at 2; Bryson AJA at 85
DECISION: 1. Appeal allowed. 2. Set aside the orders made by Finnane DCJ on 5 October 2007. 3. Remit the matter to the District Court of New South Wales for a new trial. 4. Costs of the first trial to abide the event of the second trial. 5. Respondent to pay the appellants' costs of the appeal and to have a certificate under the Suitors' Fund Act 1951 if otherwise entitled.
CATCHWORDS: APPEAL – appeal – proceedings to recover fees said to be due on wrongful termination of agreement – competing versions of making of agreement and its terms – ex tempore judgment – whether failure to give reasons for decision – extent of obligation to give reasons – adequacy of reasons - APPEAL – new trial – inadequate reasons – whether new trial should be ordered – whether evidence so compelling Court should not order new trial
LEGISLATION CITED: Suitors' Fund Act 1951
CATEGORY: Principal judgment
Barrier Wharfs Ltd v W Scott Fell & Co Ltd [1908] HCA 88; (1908) 5 CLR 647 Beale v Government Insurance Office of New South Wales (1997) 48 NSWLR 430 Bourke v Beneficial Finance Corp Ltd (1993) 47 FCR 264 Brambles Holdings Ltd v Bathurst City Council [2001] NSWCA 61; (2001) 53 NSWLR 153 Browne v Dunn (1893) 6 R 67 Ermogenous v Greek Orthodox Community of SA Inc [2002] HCA 8; (2002) 209 CLR 95 Flannery v Halifax Estate Agencies Ltd t/as Colleys Professional Services [2000] 1 All ER 373 Goodrich Aerospace Pty Limited v Arsic [2006] NSWCA 187; (2006) 66 NSWLR 186 Hull v Thompson [2001] NSWCA 359 Hunter v Transport Accident Commission (2005) 43 MVR 130; [2005] VSCA 1 Jones v Bradley [2003] NSWCA 81 Maviglia v Maviglia [1999] NSWCA 188 Meates v Attorney-General [1983] NZLR 308 Mifsud v Campbell (1991) 21 NSWLR 725 CASES CITED: Moylan v Nutrasweet Co [2000] NSWCA 337 Najdovski v Crnojlovic [2008] NSWCA 175 North Sydney Council v Ligon 302 Pty Ltd (1995) 87 LGERA 435 NSW Insurance Ministerial Corporation (formerly Government Insurance Office (NSW)) v Mesiti (Court of Appeal, 1 December 1994, unreported) Pacific Carriers Limited v BNP Paribas [2004] HCA 35; (2004) 218 CLR 451 Palmer v Clarke (1989) 19 NSWLR 158 Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs; Ex parte Palme [2003] HCA 56; (2003) 216 CLR 212 Soulemezis v Dudley (Holdings) Pty Limited (1987) 10 NSWLR 247 State Rail Authority of New South Wales v Earthline Constructions Pty Ltd (in liq) [1999] HCA 3; (1999) 73 ALJR 306 Sun Alliance Insurance Ltd v Massoud [1989] VR 8 TCN Channel Nine Pty Ltd v Anning [2002] NSWCA 82; (2002) 54 NSWLR 333 Vroon BV v Foster's Brewing Group [1994] 2 VR 32 Waterways Authority v Fitzgibbon; Mosman Municipal Council v Fitzgibbon; Middle Harbour Yacht Club v Fitzgibbon [2005] HCA 57; (2005) 79 ALJR 1816 Wright v Australian Broadcasting Commission [1977] 1 NSWLR 697 Yates Property Corporation Pty Limited (In Liq) v Darling Harbour Authority (1991) 24 NSWLR 156
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate