NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: Stephens v R [2010] NSWCCA 93
HEARING DATE(S): 2nd October 2009
JUDGMENT DATE: 5 May 2010
JUDGMENT OF: Latham J at 1; Fullerton J at 2; Schmidt J at 79
1. Leave to appeal is granted 2. The appeal is allowed in part DECISION: 3. The sentences imposed on counts 1 and 2 are confirmed 4. The sentence on count 3 is quashed and in lieu, a non parole period of 5 years is imposed, to date from 14 January 2014, expiring 13 January 2019, with a balance of term expiring 13 January 2025. 5. The sentence on count 4 is quashed and in lieu, a non parole period of 4 years is imposed, to date from 14 January 2015, expiring 13 January 2019, with a balance of term expiring 13 January 2023. 6. The applicant is eligible for release to parole on 14 January 2019.
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW - SENTENCING - Appeal against the severity of sentences imposed in District Court - aggravated detain for advantage contrary to s 86(2)(b) of the Crimes Act1900 - aggravated sexual assault contrary to ss 61I and 61J(1) of the Crimes Act - take and drive conveyance contrary to s 154A(1)(a) of the Crimes Act – - s 54A of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 – whether objective seriousness of act within mid range - R v Way [2004] NSWCCA 131 - 60 NSWLR 168 – whether sentence for aggravated kidnapping was manifestly excessive – whether three counts of aggravated sexual assault were offences of the worst type – whether approach to the calculation of sentence contrary to Markarian v R [2005] HCA 25 - 228 CLR 357 by failing to afford sufficient weight to the applicant's subjective circumstances – whether sentence is manifestly excessive by breaching the principle of totality -
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate