NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: Quealey v R [2010] NSWCCA 116
HEARING DATE(S): 4 March 2010
JUDGMENT DATE: 4 June 2010
JUDGMENT OF: Giles JA at 1; Hulme J at 2; Latham J at 8
DECISION: Leave to appeal allowed Appeal dismissed
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW - Appeal agains sentence- offences under s 36(1) Firearms Act 1996 and s93GA(1) Crimes Act 1900 - whether Judge erred in assessment of objective gravity of offences - whether motive for commission of offences reduced offender's moral culpability - whether disparity of sentence with co-offender - whether sentence manifestly excessive.
LEGISLATION CITED: Firearms Act 1996 Crimes Act 1900
CATEGORY: Principal judgment
R v Swan [2006] NSWCCA 47 R v Mitchell [2007] NSWCCA 296; (2007) 177 A Crim R 94 CASES CITED : Barlow v The Queen [2008] NSWCCA 96; (2008) 184 A Crim R 187 R v Rayment [2010] NSWCCA 85 R v Dole ; R v Nguyen [2010] NSWCCA 101 R v Daetz [2003] NSWCCA 216; (2003) 139 A Crim R 398
PARTIES: Julie Ann Quealey - Applicant Regina - Crown Respondent
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2008/6624
COUNSEL: H Cox - Applicant S Dowling - Crown Respondent
SOLICITORS: S Hopkins - Aboriginal Legal Service - Applicant S Kavanagh - Solicitor for Public Prosecutions - Crown Respondent
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: District Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): 2008/6624
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Keleman SC DCJ
LOWER COURT DATE OF DECISION: 31 March 2009
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 2008/6624
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate