Yakmor v Hamdoush (No 2) [2009] NSWCA 284

NSW Caselaw

Document text

Reported Decision: 76 NSWLR 148

New South Wales Court of Appeal

CITATION: Yakmor v Hamdoush (No 2) [2009] NSWCA 284

HEARING DATE(S): (On written submissions)

JUDGMENT DATE: 7 October 2009

JUDGMENT OF: Giles JA at 1; Ipp JA at 48; Tobias JA at 49

DECISION: 1. The appellant pay the respondent's costs of the appeal. 2. The appellant's tutor pay to the respondent the costs the appellant is ordered to pay.

CATCHWORDS: COSTS - party under disability appealing by tutor - tutor's liability for costs - whether costs order direction against tutor - whether tutor a "party" within UCP Rules r 42.3.

LEGISLATION CITED: Civil Procedure Act 2005, s 3, s 22, s 98Crimes (Criminal Trials) Act 1999 (Vic), s 25Legal Profession Act 2004, Pt 3.2, Div 11Supreme Court Rules 1970, Pt 52Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005, Pt 7 Div 4, r 42.3, r 42.27

ACP Magazines Pty Ltd v Motion [2000] NSWSC 1169; in the matter of Bauhaus Pyrmont Pty Ltd (in liq) [2006] NSWSC 879; Buckly v Buckeridge(1767) 1 Dick 395; 21 ER 323 ex parte Brocklebank (1877) 6 Ch D 358; Caley v Caley (1877) 25 WR 528; Catt v Wood (1908) 2 KB 458; Darke v Eltherington (1963) QdR 375; ex parte Davis (1901) 1 SR (NSW) 187; Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v P (1987) 11 NSWLR 200; Dey v Victorian Railways Commissioners (1949) 78 CLR 62; Dissidomino v Butcher Paull & Calder [2005] WASCA 210; Farrell v Royal Kings Park Tennis Club (Inc) [2007] WASCA 173; Fisher v Marin [2008] NSWSC 1357; Jackson v Roberts (1941) ALR 365; CASES CITED: Law Society of New South Wales v Jackson (1981) 1 NSWLR 730; Nadine v Protective Commissioner (Young J, 6 October 1993, unreported); NSW Insurance Ministerial Corporation v Abualfoul [1999] FCA 433; Masling v Motor Hiring Company (Manchester) Ltd (1919) 2 KB 535; O'Brien v O'Brien (1995) 35 NSWLR 664; O'Brien v The Herald and Weekly Times Ltd (1937) VLR 135; Pink v J A Sharwood & Co Ltd (1913) 2 Ch 286; Radford v Cavanagh (1899) 15 WN 226; Rhodes v Swithenbank (1889) 22 QBD 577; Spina v Permanent Custodians Ltd [2008] NSWSC 561; Spina v Permanent Custodians Ltd [2009] NSWCA 206; State Rail Authority of New South Wales v Hammond (1988) 15 NSWLR 395; Steeden v Walden (1910) 2 Ch 393; Victoria Legal Aid v The County Court of Victoria [2004] VSCA 113; Woolf v Woolf (1899) 1 Ch 343; Yakmor v Hamdoush [2009] NSWCA 137.

Read full text →

Official source

We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.

Not checked yet

Last checked with source on —

Open official source

Checking whether the official page can be embedded…

Study brief

Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.

Unknown

No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.

You've got 21 of 22 free Acts left this visit. Sign up anytime for Facts, Related, and study briefs too.

Document text

Reported Decision: 76 NSWLR 148

New South Wales Court of Appeal

CITATION: Yakmor v Hamdoush (No 2) [2009] NSWCA 284

HEARING DATE(S): (On written submissions)

JUDGMENT DATE: 7 October 2009

JUDGMENT OF: Giles JA at 1; Ipp JA at 48; Tobias JA at 49

DECISION: 1. The appellant pay the respondent's costs of the appeal. 2. The appellant's tutor pay to the respondent the costs the appellant is ordered to pay.

CATCHWORDS: COSTS - party under disability appealing by tutor - tutor's liability for costs - whether costs order direction against tutor - whether tutor a "party" within UCP Rules r 42.3.

Read full text →