NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Dixon v Cargill Meat Processors Pty Limited & Ors (No 2) [2009] NSWSC 114
HEARING DATE(S) : 3 March 2009, 4 March 2009
JUDGMENT DATE : 5 March 2009
JUDGMENT OF : Schmidt AJ
CATCHWORDS : PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - reasons for decision - plaintiff's adjournment granted - late joinder application - documents produced by newly joined defendant to be considered - failure to comply with Court directions - costs
LEGISLATION CITED : Civil Procedure Act 2005 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules
Stephen John Dixon - Plaintiff Cargill Meat Processors Pty Limited - First Defendant in 020245/08 PARTIES : Cargill Australia Limited t/as Cargill Beef Australia - Second Defendant in 020245/08 Ecowize Specialised Hygiene Services Pty Ltd - Third Defendant in 020245/08 Ecowize South Pty Limited - Defendant in 020252/08
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 020245/08; 020252/08
Mr RV Letherbarrow SC with Mr DM Wilson - Plaintiff COUNSEL : Mr GM Watson SC - First and Second Defendants in 020245/08 Mr P Perry, counsel - Defendant in 020252/08 Mr N Polin, counsel - Third Defendant in 020245/08
Stacks - Plaintiff SOLICITORS : Henry Davis York - First and Second Defendants in 020245/08 Moray & Agnew - Third Defendant in 020245/08 Kemp & Co - Defendant in 020252/08
- 1 - IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION
SCHMIDT AJ
Thursday, 5 March 2009
020245/08 STEPHEN JOHN DIXON -V- CARGILL MEAT PROCESSORS PTY LIMITED AND ORS
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate