NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: Ibrahim v Regina [2009] NSWCCA 15
HEARING DATE(S): 5/2/09
JUDGMENT DATE: 13 February 2009
JUDGMENT OF: Grove J at 1; Blanch J at 2; Kirby J at 3
DECISION: Leave to appeal granted, but the appeal dismissed.
CATCHWORDS: Criminal Law - sentence appeal - manslaughter - extended joint criminal enterprise - whether inference of planning open - whether sentence manifestly excessive.
LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes Act 1900 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999
CATEGORY: Principal judgment
R v Ibrahim [2008] NSWSC 268 R v Hung Duc Dang [2001] NSWCCA 321 R v Cardoso [001] NSWSC 775 R v Nicholas Hampton [2004] NSWSC 1215 CASES CITED : R v Walsh, R v Sharp [2004] NSWSC 111; (2004) 142 A Crim R 140 R v Diab [2007] NSWSC 577 R v Taiseni, Motuapuaka, Leota, Tuifua [2007] NSWSC 1090 R v Forbes [2005] NSWCCA 377; (2005) 160 A Crim R 1 Hill (1981) 3 A Crim R 397 Taber & Styman v R [2007] NSWCCA 116; (2007) 170 A Crim R 427
PARTIES: Michael Ibrahim (Appl) Regina (Resp/Crown)
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2006/4050
COUNSEL: P Boulten SC (Appl) D Frearson SC (Resp/Crown)
SOLICITORS: Alexanders Lawyers (Appl) S Kavanagh (Resp/Crown)
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: Supreme Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): 2006/2811
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Price J
LOWER COURT DATE OF DECISION: 21/4/08
LOWER COURT MEDIUM NEUTRAL CITATION: [2008] NSWSC 268
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate