NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Hosking & Anor v Haas & Anor (No. 2) [2009] NSWSC 1328
HEARING DATE(S) : 2 and 3 April 2009, 3 and 10 July 2009, 28 September 2009
JUDGMENT DATE : 8 December 2009
JUDGMENT OF : Bergin CJ in Eq
DECISION : Plaintiff entitled to relief
CATCHWORDS : [EQUITY] - [BUILDING SCHEMES] - Whether common building scheme exists in Estate - Whether breach of covenant - Whether plaintiff entitled to relief
LEGISLATION CITED : Real Property Act 1900 (NSW)
Application of Fox (1981) 2 BPR [97111] 9310 Baxter v Four Oaks Properties Ltd [1965] Ch 816 Elliston v Reacher [1908] 2 Ch 374 Elliston v Reacher [1908] 2 Ch 665 Osborne v Bradley [1903] 2 Ch 446 Phillip Arthur Hosking & Anor v Peter Haas & Anor [2009] NSWSC 624 CASES CITED : Pirie v Registrar-General (1962) 109 CLR 619 Re Dennerstein [1963] VR 688 Re Louis and the Conveyancing Act [1971] 1 NSWLR 164 Re Mack and the Conveyancing Act [1975] 2 NSWLR 623 Re Martyn (1965) 65 S.R. (N.S.W.) 387 Reid v Bickerstaff [1909] 2 Ch 305 Sutton v Shoppee [1963] S.R. (N.S.W.) 853 White v Bijou Mansions Ltd [1938] Ch 351
TEXTS CITED : P Butt, Lawbook Co, Land Law (5th ed, 2006) Sydney
Phillip Arthur Hosking (First Plaintiff) PARTIES : Dorothy Hosking (Second Plaintiff) Peter Haas (First Defendant) Evelyn Haas (Second Defendant)
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 1767 of 2008
COUNSEL : M Stirling (Plaintiffs) M Baird (Defendants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate