NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Howell v O'Brien [2009] NSWSC 538
HEARING DATE(S) : 25/05/09; 26/05/09;27/05/09
JUDGMENT DATE : 15 June 2009
JUDGMENT OF : Patten AJ at 1
DECISION : See paragraph 95
Uniform Civil Procedure Rules; Macquarie University Act 1989 Freedom of Information Act 1989; LEGISLATION CITED : Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997 Superannuation (Resolution of Complaints) Act (Cwth) 1993; Interpretation Act 1987; Defamation Act 2005; Ombudsman Act 1974
AWB Ltd v Cole (No. 5) [2006] 155 FCR 30; Blair v Curran ([1939] 62 CLR 464 at 53; Rippon v Chilcotin Pty Ltd (2001) 53 NSWLR 198; CASES CITED : State Bank of NSW v Stenhouse Ltd (1997) Aust Torts Reports 81-423 (64,077 at 64,089); Attorney General for the Commonwealth v Breckler (1999) 197 CLR 83; General Steel Industries Inc v Commissioner of Railways (1964 112 CLR 125 at 129; Jago v District Court of NSW (1989) 168 CLR 23; Kaplan v Go Daddy Group Inc [2006] NSWSC 250
TEXTS CITED : D C Pearce and R S Geddes, Statutory Interpretation in Australia 6th Edition: Spencer Bowen Turner and Handley, The Doctrine of Res Judicata 3rd Edition;
PARTIES : Sally Clare Howell - Plaintiff Jennifer Jane O'Brien - Defendant
FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 020014 of 2009
COUNSEL : Mr P Howell - Plaintiff Mr B McClintock with Mr A Dawson - Defendant
SOLICITORS : P Howell - Plaintiff Ebsworth Lawyers - Defendant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate