NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION: Visnic v Sywak [2009] NSWCA 173
HEARING DATE(S): 14 May 2009
JUDGMENT DATE: 1 July 2009
JUDGMENT OF: Spigelman CJ at 1; Campbell JA at 47; Macfarlan JA at 50
DECISION: Appeal dismissed with costs.
CATCHWORDS: CORPORATIONS – distinction between company and shareholders – limitations on shareholders' rights to enforce duties owed to company - EQUITY – equitable remedies – accounts and inquiries – sufficient connection – scope of breach of fiduciary duty – inquiry to determine equitable damages and/or account of profits by reason of breaches of fiduciary duty – whether sufficient connection between breach of fiduciary duty and inquiry for purposes of determining account of profits – whether breach was a conflict of interest and duty – deprivation of shareholding – evidence of benefits and profits – distinction between trust and fiduciary relationship - EQUITY - equitable remedies - accounts and inquiries - whether trial judge took into account irrelevant considerations - fiduciary's conduct capable of constituting breach of duties owed to companies - EQUITY – equitable remedies – election between equitable compensation and disgorgement damages - WORDS AND PHRASES – "sufficient connection"
LEGISLATION CITED: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005
Agricultural and Rural Finance Pty Ltd v Gardiner [2008] HCA 57; (2008) 83 ALJR 196 Canson Enterprises Ltd v Boughton & Co [1991] 3 SCR 534 Chan v Zacharia (1983–1984) 154 CLR 178 Friend v Brooker [2009] HCA 21; (2009) 255 ALR 601 Hill v Rose [1990] VR 129 Hunter Area Health Service v Presland [2005] NSWCA 33; (2005) 63 NSWLR 22 In re Coomber; Coomber v Coomber [1911] 1 Ch 723 CASES CITED: Keech v Sandford (1726) Sel Cas T King 61; 25 ER 223 Lumbers v W Cook Builders Pty Ltd (in liquidation) [2008] HCA 27; (2008) 232 CLR 635 Maguire v Makaronis (1996–1997) 188 CLR 449 New South Wales v Paige [2002] NSWCA 235; (2002) 60 NSWLR 371 Personal Representatives of Tang Man Sit v Capacious Investments Ltd [1996] AC 514 Prudential Assurance Co Ltd v Newman Industries Ltd (No 2) [1982] Ch 204 Re Dawson (deceased); Union Fidelity Trustee Co Ltd v Perpetual Trustee Co Ltd [1966] 2 NSWR 211 Sullivan v Moody [2001] HCA 59; (2001) 207 CLR 562 Warman International Limited v Dwyer (1994–1995) 182 CLR 544
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate