NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION: Shane DELLA-VEDOVA v R [2009] NSWCCA 107 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
HEARING DATE(S): 2 April 2009
JUDGMENT DATE: 21 April 2009
JUDGMENT OF: McClellan CJatCL at 1; Simpson J at 2; Buddin J at 87
DECISION: Leave to appeal granted. Appeal dismissed.
CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW - particular offences - property offences - unauthorised possession of prohibited weapons - dishonest appropriation of Commonwealth property - CRIMINAL LAW - appeal against sentence - whether error in considering evidence of remorse - whether error in accumulation of sentences - whether error in applying discount for plea of guilty - whether sentence manifestly excessive
Weapons Prohibition Act 1998 (NSW) LEGISLATION CITED: Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Listening Devices Act 1984
CATEGORY: Principal judgment
R v Thomson; R v Houlton [2000] NSWCCA 309; 49 NSWLR 383 R v Lodhi [2006] NSWSC 691 CASES CITED : Pearce v The Queen [1998] HCA 57; 194 CLR 610 R v Dudko [2002] NSWCCA 336; 132 A Crim R 371 R v Shenton [2003] NSWCCA 346 Cameron v The Queen [2002] HCA 6; 209 CLR 339
PARTIES: Shane DELLA-VEDOVA (Appellant) REGINA (Respondent)
FILE NUMBER(S): CCA 2007/15984
COUNSEL: P Strickland SC (Appellant) W J Abraham QC & L K Crowley (Respondent)
SOLICITORS: S Kavanagh (Legal Aid Commission of NSW) (Appellant) Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate